- On Oct 23, 2020, at 1:37 AM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
> On 10/22/2020 9:19 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Xing Zhengjun
>> zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>> In fact, 0-day just copy the will-it-scale benchmark
On 10/22/2020 9:19 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
[...]
In fact, 0-day just copy the will-it-scale benchmark from the GitHub, if
you think the will-it-scale benchmark has some issues, you can
contribute your
- On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
[...]
> In fact, 0-day just copy the will-it-scale benchmark from the GitHub, if
> you think the will-it-scale benchmark has some issues, you can
> contribute your idea and help to improve it, later we will updat
On 10/20/2020 9:14 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:24 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
On 10/7/2020 10:50 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -37
- On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:24 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
> On 10/7/2020 10:50 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote:
>>
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed a -37.0% regression of will-it-scale.per_t
On 10/7/2020 10:50 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -37.0% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to
commit:
commit: bdfcae11403e5099769a7c8dc3262e3c4193edef ("[RFC PATCH 2/3] sched:
m
- On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -37.0% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to
> commit:
>
>
> commit: bdfcae11403e5099769a7c8dc3262e3c4193edef ("[RFC PATCH 2/3] sched:
> membarrier: cover kthread_use_mm (v3)")
7 matches
Mail list logo