Re: [LKP] Re: [sched] bdfcae1140: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -37.0% regression

2020-10-23 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Oct 23, 2020, at 1:37 AM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com wrote: > On 10/22/2020 9:19 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> - On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Xing Zhengjun >> zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com >> wrote: >> [...] >>> In fact, 0-day just copy the will-it-scale benchmark

Re: [LKP] Re: [sched] bdfcae1140: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -37.0% regression

2020-10-22 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 10/22/2020 9:19 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: - On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com wrote: [...] In fact, 0-day just copy the will-it-scale benchmark from the GitHub, if you think the will-it-scale benchmark has some issues, you can contribute your

Re: [LKP] Re: [sched] bdfcae1140: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -37.0% regression

2020-10-22 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com wrote: [...] > In fact, 0-day just copy the will-it-scale benchmark from the GitHub, if > you think the will-it-scale benchmark has some issues, you can > contribute your idea and help to improve it, later we will updat

Re: [LKP] Re: [sched] bdfcae1140: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -37.0% regression

2020-10-21 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 10/20/2020 9:14 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: - On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:24 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 10/7/2020 10:50 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: - On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote: Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -37

Re: [LKP] Re: [sched] bdfcae1140: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -37.0% regression

2020-10-20 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:24 PM, Xing Zhengjun zhengjun.x...@linux.intel.com wrote: > On 10/7/2020 10:50 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> - On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote: >> >>> Greeting, >>> >>> FYI, we noticed a -37.0% regression of will-it-scale.per_t

Re: [LKP] Re: [sched] bdfcae1140: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -37.0% regression

2020-10-19 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 10/7/2020 10:50 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: - On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote: Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -37.0% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to commit: commit: bdfcae11403e5099769a7c8dc3262e3c4193edef ("[RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: m

Re: [sched] bdfcae1140: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -37.0% regression

2020-10-07 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Oct 2, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Rong Chen rong.a.c...@intel.com wrote: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -37.0% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to > commit: > > > commit: bdfcae11403e5099769a7c8dc3262e3c4193edef ("[RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: > membarrier: cover kthread_use_mm (v3)")