On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:01:03PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
>...
> Adrian, this should also apply against 2.6.16.y
Thanks, applied.
> Thank you,
>
> Michael Krufky
>...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:01:03PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
...
Adrian, this should also apply against 2.6.16.y
Thanks, applied.
Thank you,
Michael Krufky
...
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need
Michael Krufky wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> Ok, I've now gotten all of these for .19 and .18.
>>
>> If I've missed anything, please let me know.
>>
>> thanks for your patience.
>
> Looks good... Thank you, Greg.
>
> Greg KH wrote:
>> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable
Michael Krufky wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
Ok, I've now gotten all of these for .19 and .18.
If I've missed anything, please let me know.
thanks for your patience.
Looks good... Thank you, Greg.
Greg KH wrote:
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there
Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, I've now gotten all of these for .19 and .18.
>
> If I've missed anything, please let me know.
>
> thanks for your patience.
Looks good... Thank you, Greg.
Greg KH wrote:
> This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
> if there are patches that
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> > Michael Krufky wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
> > release (and the patches are serious
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:51:56AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
Michael Krufky wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent
Greg KH wrote:
Ok, I've now gotten all of these for .19 and .18.
If I've missed anything, please let me know.
thanks for your patience.
Looks good... Thank you, Greg.
Greg KH wrote:
This will probably be the last release of the 2.6.19-stable series, so
if there are patches that you feel
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> Michael Krufky wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >
> I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
> release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.)
> >>> Actually, I have a few more -stable
Michael Krufky wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>
I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.)
>>> Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both 2.6.18.y and 2.6.19.y,
>>> if
>>> you don't mind holding off
Michael Krufky wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.)
Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both 2.6.18.y and 2.6.19.y,
if
you don't mind holding off a day or two (wont
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
Michael Krufky wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.)
Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both
Greg KH wrote:
>>> I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
>>> release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.)
>> Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both 2.6.18.y and 2.6.19.y,
>> if
>> you don't mind holding off a day or two (wont have time to
Greg KH wrote:
I'll go through the archives and see if there's enough to do a .18
release (and the patches are serious enough to warrent it.)
Actually, I have a few more -stable patches for both 2.6.18.y and 2.6.19.y,
if
you don't mind holding off a day or two (wont have time to prepare
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:16:11PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> >> Chris Wright wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release.
> >>> There are 50 patches in this series, all
Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
>> Chris Wright wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release.
>>> There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:12:33PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> > > At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped? I thought we were always going to
> > > keep
> > > the last two stable kernels
* Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> > At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped? I thought we were always going to keep
> > the last two stable kernels up-to-date.
Not quite. It's more of a "some overlap," so that as soon as 2.6.x
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release.
> > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release.
There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied,
* Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped? I thought we were always going to keep
the last two stable kernels up-to-date.
Not quite. It's more of a some overlap, so that as soon as 2.6.x
comes
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:12:33PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
At which point was 2.6.18.y dropped? I thought we were always going to
keep
the last two stable kernels up-to-date.
Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release.
There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:16:11PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.19.2 release.
There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted
24 matches
Mail list logo
