Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Yeah - fix your mailer, you got a reply 5 days ago. > > Sure wouldn't be the first time something broke. I'll take a look. Thanks for the prod. I found 2 quite stale RBL entries, causing long connection delay

Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Yeah - fix your mailer, you got a reply 5 days ago. Sure wouldn't be the first time something broke. I'll take a look. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Alan Cox
> It's there specifically to fish out why it was sent to -stable w/out > ever making it upstream. Having sent the same question w/ no response > 5 days ago Yeah - fix your mailer, you got a reply 5 days ago. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chris Wright wrote: > > --- > > [chrisw: Why is this not upstream yet?] > > And equally importantly, why is it even in the stable queue if it's not > upstream. > > It's against stable rules, and it means that we may have stuff

Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chris Wright wrote: --- [chrisw: Why is this not upstream yet?] And equally importantly, why is it even in the stable queue if it's not upstream. It's against stable rules, and it means that we may have stuff that gets

Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Alan Cox
It's there specifically to fish out why it was sent to -stable w/out ever making it upstream. Having sent the same question w/ no response 5 days ago Yeah - fix your mailer, you got a reply 5 days ago. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body

Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yeah - fix your mailer, you got a reply 5 days ago. Sure wouldn't be the first time something broke. I'll take a look. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: [stable] [patch 07/69] libata-sff: Undo bug introduced with pci_iomap changes

2007-05-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yeah - fix your mailer, you got a reply 5 days ago. Sure wouldn't be the first time something broke. I'll take a look. Thanks for the prod. I found 2 quite stale RBL entries, causing long connection delay