On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:34 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 31 March 2007 19:28, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
> > For long time now I use windows to work
> > problems. I cannot play wine games with audio, I
> > cannot sample video, I cannot use skype, I cannot play
> > midi. And even linux onl
On Saturday 31 March 2007 19:28, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
> For long time now I use windows to work
> problems. I cannot play wine games with audio, I
> cannot sample video, I cannot use skype, I cannot play
> midi. And even linux only things I try do I cannot
> share my X, I cannot use more than
On Thursday 29 March 2007 21:22, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [ A quick guess: could SD's substandard interactivity in this test be
> due to the SMP migration logic inconsistencies Mike noticed? This is
> an SMP system and the hackbench workload is very scheduling intense
> and tasks are frequently q
Xenofon,
could you tell us a bit more about the specs of your system? What CPU
speed for example? (i suspect it's a single-CPU box, right?)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
* Xenofon Antidides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I cannot play wine games with audio, I cannot sample video, I
> cannot use skype, I cannot play midi. And even linux only things I try
> do I cannot share my X, I cannot use more than one vmware. [...]
strange - i can do such things (and o
--- Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:41 -0700, Xenofon Antidides
> wrote:
>
> > Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD.
>
> Shrug. My milage is different, but hey, it's a work
> in progress. If SD
> ever gets to the point that it actually deliver
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 08:31 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:41 -0700, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
>
> > Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD.
General comment directed at nobody in particular:
If anyone thinks the current scheduler sucks rocks, maybe they should
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:41 -0700, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
> Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD.
Shrug. My milage is different, but hey, it's a work in progress. If SD
ever gets to the point that it actually delivers what it claims, I may
join you.
In the meantime, IMHO mainlin
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 05:42 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Yesterday, I piddled around with tracking interactive backlog as a way
> to detect when the load isn't really an interactive load, that's very
> simple and has potential.
Kinda like the patch below (though it can all be done slow path), o
--- Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:36 -0700, Xenofon Antidides
> wrote:
>
> > Something different on many cpus? Sorry I was
> thinking
> > something other. I try 50% run + 50% sleep on one
> cpu
> > and mainline has big problem. Sorry for bad code I
> > copy
ject: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm cautiously optimistic that we're at the thin edge of the bugfix
wedge now.
[...]
and the numbers he posted:
http://m
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 05:23 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:36 -0700, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
>
> > Something different on many cpus? Sorry I was thinking
> > something other. I try 50% run + 50% sleep on one cpu
> > and mainline has big problem. Sorry for bad code I
> > c
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:36 -0700, Xenofon Antidides wrote:
> Something different on many cpus? Sorry I was thinking
> something other. I try 50% run + 50% sleep on one cpu
> and mainline has big problem. Sorry for bad code I
> copy bits to make it work. Start program first then
> run bash 100% cp
list ;
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mike
> Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:22:49 PM
> > Subject: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results:
> vanilla versus SD/RSDL
> >
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED
;
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:22:49 PM
> Subject: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
>
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm cautiousl
- Original Message
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: linux list ; Andrew Morton <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>; Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:22:49 PM
Subject: [test] hackbench.c interactivity
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm cautiously optimistic that we're at the thin edge of the bugfix
> > wedge now.
[...]
> and the numbers he posted:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117448900626028&w=2
>
> his test conclusion
17 matches
Mail list logo
