Commit-ID:  94247f76e7361afd85ba03a3f923bf3d07ba3017
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/94247f76e7361afd85ba03a3f923bf3d07ba3017
Author:     Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:08:27 +0200
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 16:52:10 +0200

Retiplockingcore_rtmutex_Deboost_before_waking_up_the_top_waiter

mark_wakeup_next_waiter() already disables preemption, doing so again
leaves us with an unpaired preempt_disable().

Fixes: 2a1c60299406 ("rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter")
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: xlp...@redhat.com
Cc: rost...@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1491379707.6538.2.ca...@gmx.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 0e641eb..b955094 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1581,13 +1581,13 @@ bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex 
*lock,
                return false; /* done */
        }
 
-       mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
        /*
-        * We've already deboosted, retain preempt_disabled when dropping
-        * the wait_lock to avoid inversion until the wakeup. Matched
-        * by rt_mutex_postunlock();
+        * We've already deboosted, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will
+        * retain preempt_disabled when we drop the wait_lock, to
+        * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup.  preempt_disable()
+        * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock().
         */
-       preempt_disable();
+       mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
 
        return true; /* call postunlock() */
 }

Reply via email to