On 10/02/2013 11:36 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:11:14PM -0500, Ashley D Lai wrote:
>
>>> I somewhat have the feeling that we should maybe begin to deprecate
>>> the vendor specific 1.1 tpms...
>
>> I agree. If we have a machine to test and it fails then we know we don'
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:11:14PM -0500, Ashley D Lai wrote:
> > I somewhat have the feeling that we should maybe begin to deprecate
> > the vendor specific 1.1 tpms...
> I agree. If we have a machine to test and it fails then we know we don't
> have a user for this.
Is this driver is only used
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 00:00 +0200, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> Am Montag, 23. September 2013, 20:14:32 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
>
> > Commit e0dd03caf20d040a0a86b6bd74028ec9bda545f5
>
> > changed the code path here so that ateml_get_base_addr
>
> > no longer directly altered the tpm_vendor_specific
>
>
3 matches
Mail list logo