Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/3] UML - x86_64 thread fixes

2007-02-21 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 08 February 2007 22:57, Jeff Dike wrote: > x86_64 needs some TLS fixes. What was missing was remembering the > child thread id during clone and stuffing it into the child during > each context switch. > > The %fs value is stored separately in the thread structure since the > host

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/3] UML - x86_64 thread fixes

2007-02-21 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 08 February 2007 22:57, Jeff Dike wrote: x86_64 needs some TLS fixes. What was missing was remembering the child thread id during clone and stuffing it into the child during each context switch. The %fs value is stored separately in the thread structure since the host controls