On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:04:35AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Which kernel? I've not yet tested 2.6.20. I'll try debugging this
> subsequently.
2.6.20-rc6-mm3 on 2.6.20 + patches works for me.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To
On Friday 16 February 2007 20:02, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting
> > a 32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this
> > fix was merged in
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting a
> 32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this fix
> was merged in 2.6.19) to avoid tons of TLS errors.
I'm not seeing that.
On Thursday 15 February 2007 18:01, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:51:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Whatever happens, please ensure that the final fix makes it into -stable
> > as well. Jeff's version of this patch wasn't cc'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Paolo's patch was sent
On Thursday 15 February 2007 18:01, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:51:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Whatever happens, please ensure that the final fix makes it into -stable
as well. Jeff's version of this patch wasn't cc'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paolo's patch was sent to
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting a
32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this fix
was merged in 2.6.19) to avoid tons of TLS errors.
I'm not seeing that. With
On Friday 16 February 2007 20:02, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting
a 32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this
fix was merged in 2.6.19) to
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:04:35AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
Which kernel? I've not yet tested 2.6.20. I'll try debugging this
subsequently.
2.6.20-rc6-mm3 on 2.6.20 + patches works for me.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:51:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Whatever happens, please ensure that the final fix makes it into -stable
> as well. Jeff's version of this patch wasn't cc'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paolo's patch was sent to -stable. His should be used everywhere, and mine
should
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:51:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Whatever happens, please ensure that the final fix makes it into -stable
as well. Jeff's version of this patch wasn't cc'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paolo's patch was sent to -stable. His should be used everywhere, and mine
should be
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:43:41 +0100 Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I sent an equivalent patch in earlier today:
> Doh! Interesting this timing...
>
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> > ===
> > ---
On Thursday 15 February 2007 03:54, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:34:23AM +0100, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
> > ===
> > ---
On Thursday 15 February 2007 03:54, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:34:23AM +0100, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
===
---
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:43:41 +0100 Blaisorblade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sent an equivalent patch in earlier today:
Doh! Interesting this timing...
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
===
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
