On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 03:14:05PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2020-06-12 14:36:35, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > As it stands if you include printk.h by itself it will fail to
> > compile because it requires definitions from ratelimit.h. However,
> > simply including ratelimit.h from printk.h
On Fri 2020-06-12 14:36:35, Herbert Xu wrote:
> As it stands if you include printk.h by itself it will fail to
> compile because it requires definitions from ratelimit.h. However,
> simply including ratelimit.h from printk.h does not work due to
> inclusion loops involving sched.h and kernel.h.
>
On (20/06/12 14:36), Herbert Xu wrote:
> As it stands if you include printk.h by itself it will fail to
> compile because it requires definitions from ratelimit.h. However,
> simply including ratelimit.h from printk.h does not work due to
> inclusion loops involving sched.h and kernel.h.
>
>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 7:39 AM Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> As it stands if you include printk.h by itself it will fail to
> compile because it requires definitions from ratelimit.h. However,
> simply including ratelimit.h from printk.h does not work due to
> inclusion loops involving sched.h and
As it stands if you include printk.h by itself it will fail to
compile because it requires definitions from ratelimit.h. However,
simply including ratelimit.h from printk.h does not work due to
inclusion loops involving sched.h and kernel.h.
This patch solves this by moving bits from ratelimit.h
5 matches
Mail list logo
