On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:23 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 02:37:22PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > The number of deferred objects might get windup to an absurd number, and it
> > results in
> > clamp of slab objects. It is undesirable for sustaining workingset.
> >
> > So
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 02:37:22PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> The number of deferred objects might get windup to an absurd number, and it
> results in
> clamp of slab objects. It is undesirable for sustaining workingset.
>
> So shrink deferred objects proportional to priority and cap nr_deferred
The number of deferred objects might get windup to an absurd number, and it
results in
clamp of slab objects. It is undesirable for sustaining workingset.
So shrink deferred objects proportional to priority and cap nr_deferred to
twice of
cache items.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi
---
mm/vmscan.c
3 matches
Mail list logo