On 8/11/07, Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > On 8/1/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 7/31/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if "fe" was
> > >
On 8/11/07, Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/1/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if fe was
NULL.
---
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/31/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if "fe" was
> > NULL.
> > >
> > > ---
On 8/1/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if "fe" was
> NULL.
> >
> > Since "fe" being NULL seems impossible at this point this patch removes
> > the NULL check.
> >
> >
On 8/1/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if fe was
NULL.
Since fe being NULL seems impossible at this point this patch removes
the NULL check.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 8/1/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if fe was
NULL.
---
6 matches
Mail list logo