On 7/12/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- there may be other edge cases other than
> this one. I'm actually surprised that this wasn't a ring buffer to start
> with -- it certainly seems like it wanted to be one.
The problem with a ring buffer is that it would lose old entries;
On Thursday 12 July 2007 22:24:36 Joshua Wise wrote:
> Some time after my first[1] patch to mce.c, I had continued testing using
> the test method described there (inject hundreds of thousands of single-bit
> errors while reading from /dev/mcelog), and I came across a strange issue.
> Once every
Some time after my first[1] patch to mce.c, I had continued testing using
the test method described there (inject hundreds of thousands of single-bit
errors while reading from /dev/mcelog), and I came across a strange issue.
Once every couple test cycles (i.e., every hundred-thousand injects),
Some time after my first[1] patch to mce.c, I had continued testing using
the test method described there (inject hundreds of thousands of single-bit
errors while reading from /dev/mcelog), and I came across a strange issue.
Once every couple test cycles (i.e., every hundred-thousand injects),
On Thursday 12 July 2007 22:24:36 Joshua Wise wrote:
Some time after my first[1] patch to mce.c, I had continued testing using
the test method described there (inject hundreds of thousands of single-bit
errors while reading from /dev/mcelog), and I came across a strange issue.
Once every
On 7/12/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- there may be other edge cases other than
this one. I'm actually surprised that this wasn't a ring buffer to start
with -- it certainly seems like it wanted to be one.
The problem with a ring buffer is that it would lose old entries; but
for
6 matches
Mail list logo
