Re: [xfs] 610125ab1e: fsmark.app_overhead -71.2% improvement

2019-09-08 Thread Dave Chinner
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:06:54PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 9/9/19 1:32 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:58:49AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > Greeting, > > > > > > FYI, we noticed a -71.2% improvement of fsmark.app_overhead due to commit: > > A nega

Re: [xfs] 610125ab1e: fsmark.app_overhead -71.2% improvement

2019-09-08 Thread Rong Chen
Hi Dave, On 9/9/19 1:32 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:58:49AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -71.2% improvement of fsmark.app_overhead due to commit: A negative improvement? That's somewhat ambiguous... Sorry for causing the misunderstanding

Re: [xfs] 610125ab1e: fsmark.app_overhead -71.2% improvement

2019-09-08 Thread Dave Chinner
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 09:58:49AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -71.2% improvement of fsmark.app_overhead due to commit: A negative improvement? That's somewhat ambiguous... > 0e822255f95db400 610125ab1e4b1b48dcffe74d9d8 > --