On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:43:13AM +0100, Stefan Ring wrote:
> > Holy ancient and unsupported kernel + distribution batman. ;o)
> >
> > Have you tried 2.0.39 (said with a slight grin) ;o)
>
> Ahh, it was my fault. I forgot about binutils. Strange enough, 2.0.36
> worked and 2.0.37 not. There
> Holy ancient and unsupported kernel + distribution batman. ;o)
>
> Have you tried 2.0.39 (said with a slight grin) ;o)
Ahh, it was my fault. I forgot about binutils. Strange enough, 2.0.36
worked and 2.0.37 not. There is no change to the Changes file between
these two versions, however.
-
Stefan Ring writes:
> Every version above 2.0.36 behaves the same (from the 2.0.x series). Gee,
> I should have said a few words about my intent. Of course, I'm not
> actually using these old versions of everything. I just wanted to run a
> 2.0.x kernel to do some hardware testing, and since
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:00:31AM +0100, Stefan Ring wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason you are using a relatively new machine like that with
> > such an outdated and arcane kernel (and distribution, for that
> > matter)? I'd suggest you upgrade to a
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
> Is there a reason you are using a relatively new machine like that with
> such an outdated and arcane kernel (and distribution, for that
> matter)? I'd suggest you upgrade to a more recent kernel and/or
> distribution...it'll be a lot more stable
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
Is there a reason you are using a relatively new machine like that with
such an outdated and arcane kernel (and distribution, for that
matter)? I'd suggest you upgrade to a more recent kernel and/or
distribution...it'll be a lot more stable (and
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:00:31AM +0100, Stefan Ring wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
Is there a reason you are using a relatively new machine like that with
such an outdated and arcane kernel (and distribution, for that
matter)? I'd suggest you upgrade to a more
Stefan Ring writes:
Every version above 2.0.36 behaves the same (from the 2.0.x series). Gee,
I should have said a few words about my intent. Of course, I'm not
actually using these old versions of everything. I just wanted to run a
2.0.x kernel to do some hardware testing, and since 2.0.x
Holy ancient and unsupported kernel + distribution batman. ;o)
Have you tried 2.0.39 (said with a slight grin) ;o)
Ahh, it was my fault. I forgot about binutils. Strange enough, 2.0.36
worked and 2.0.37 not. There is no change to the Changes file between
these two versions, however.
-
To
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Stefan Ring wrote:
>Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:35:39 +0100 (MET)
>From: Stefan Ring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: 2.0.37 crashes immediately
>
>2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Stefan Ring wrote:
> 2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing linux..."
> message. I use the same configuration for 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 (basically
> it's the default configuration without anything interesting changed), and
> the latter just won't work. It
2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing linux..."
message. I use the same configuration for 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 (basically
it's the default configuration without anything interesting changed), and
the latter just won't work. It also doesn't matter if I use zImage or
bzImage.
2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing linux..."
message. I use the same configuration for 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 (basically
it's the default configuration without anything interesting changed), and
the latter just won't work. It also doesn't matter if I use zImage or
bzImage.
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Stefan Ring wrote:
2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing linux..."
message. I use the same configuration for 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 (basically
it's the default configuration without anything interesting changed), and
the latter just won't work. It
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Stefan Ring wrote:
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:35:39 +0100 (MET)
From: Stefan Ring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: 2.0.37 crashes immediately
2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing
15 matches
Mail list logo
