Re: 2.2.17 memory bug?

> Alan, it sure would be great if you could extract a minimal patch > against 2.2.17 to fix this from Andrea's stuff, and post an errata on > your webpage. Im not convinced Andrea's stuff is correct. Thats one reason for not doing it. There are folks testing both Andrea's and another idea on

Re: 2.2.17 memory bug?

Greetings! Hacksaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I apologize if this is a known issue. > You may be running into the VM: do_try_to_free_memory_failed issue -- see earlier thread. I know we certainly see it here. Alan, it sure would be great if you could extract a minimal patch against

Re: 2.2.17 memory bug?

Greetings! Hacksaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I apologize if this is a known issue. You may be running into the VM: do_try_to_free_memory_failed issue -- see earlier thread. I know we certainly see it here. Alan, it sure would be great if you could extract a minimal patch against 2.2.17 to

Re: 2.2.17 memory bug?

Alan, it sure would be great if you could extract a minimal patch against 2.2.17 to fix this from Andrea's stuff, and post an errata on your webpage. Im not convinced Andrea's stuff is correct. Thats one reason for not doing it. There are folks testing both Andrea's and another idea on this

2.2.17 memory bug?

I apologize if this is a known issue. I am running Linux version 2.2.17 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #2 SMP Sun Oct 8 02:37:43 EDT 2000 On a dual Pentium III with 256M of SDRAM, aix-7xxx, sblive, kingston tulip, 3c905, 3dfx Voodoo3 AGP.

2.2.17 memory bug?

I apologize if this is a known issue. I am running Linux version 2.2.17 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #2 SMP Sun Oct 8 02:37:43 EDT 2000 On a dual Pentium III with 256M of SDRAM, aix-7xxx, sblive, kingston tulip, 3c905, 3dfx Voodoo3 AGP.