Hi Urban,
> Anyway,
> gdb is doing strange things to your testprogram on ext2 as well. Does it
> work for you? I have not been able to reproduce a gdb hang (you do know
> that there is a while(1); in main ... ;-), but it generates a lot of smbfs
> messages and in one case made smbfs stop working.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Hans-Joachim Baader wrote:
> Then run the program. It should copy the files to the current
> directory. Then run it under gdb. It should hang until you kill
> gdb.
Hello again
(Sorry for the long response time but this really is the busiest time of
the year, or maybe it's t
Hi,
Urban Widmark wrote:
> I don't really know how signal delivery works within the kernel, but
> smb_trans2_request tries to disable some signals. That does not work
> (completely?) so either it needs fixing or the -512 errno needs to be
> handled.
>
> Why so bad in gdb? perhaps it causes more
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Hans-Joachim Baader wrote:
> and so on, endlessly. So, AFAIK, smbfs thinks it has lost connection and
> tells smbmount to re-establish it, which succeeds (at least smbmount
> thinks so). This happens several times per second.
-512 means that the recv was interrupted by a si
Hi,
I hava a strange problem with smbfs. My application creates threads
that copy files from a mounted SMB share to the local disk. When
I run the application normally, there's no problem. However when
I run it in gdb 4.18 or 5.0, one of the threads goes into the D state
(not always), and the who
5 matches
Mail list logo
