Re: 2.2.18 - failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c

2001-01-31 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:17:56 -0700, "Josh Higham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c You compiled your kernel with support for ELF objects as a module. You execute an ELF program, the kernel tries to autoload the ELF module using modprobe which is an

2.2.18 - failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c

2001-01-31 Thread Josh Higham
I tried compiling a 2.2.18 kernel, and when I reboot I get failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c scrolling past the screen. A web search reveals a comment about 2.3.99pre3, which indicates that it is a problem with the USB config (video4linux must be compiled in the kernel?). I am

Re: 2.2.18 - failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c

2001-01-31 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:17:56 -0700, Josh Higham wrote: >I tried compiling a 2.2.18 kernel, and when I reboot I get > >failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c Reconfigure with CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y and your kernel will work again. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

2.2.18 - failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c

2001-01-31 Thread Josh Higham
I tried compiling a 2.2.18 kernel, and when I reboot I get failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c scrolling past the screen. A web search reveals a comment about 2.3.99pre3, which indicates that it is a problem with the USB config (video4linux must be compiled in the kernel?). I am

Re: 2.2.18 - failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c

2001-01-31 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:17:56 -0700, "Josh Higham" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt-464c You compiled your kernel with support for ELF objects as a module. You execute an ELF program, the kernel tries to autoload the ELF module using modprobe which is an ELF