Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-10 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> Probably you confused the proper way to use ibmsetmax with > the proper way to use setmax. For setmax, and a Maxtor disk, > you do not use a different machine, put the jumper to clip, > now the boot succeeds, and you let Linux unclip. > Either with a patched kernel that knows about these

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-10 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Probably you confused the proper way to use ibmsetmax with the proper way to use setmax. For setmax, and a Maxtor disk, you do not use a different machine, put the jumper to clip, now the boot succeeds, and you let Linux unclip. Either with a patched kernel that knows about these things or

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-09 Thread Andries . Brouwer
From: Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 2.2.18 sometimes sees 61 GB, sometimes 32 GB. > > I don't call that hard to understand. > > The same kernel has varying behaviour? > Maybe not hard to understand, but rather surprising. > You are the first to report

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-09 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> > 2.2.18 sometimes sees 61 GB, sometimes 32 GB. > > I don't call that hard to understand. > > The same kernel has varying behaviour? > Maybe not hard to understand, but rather surprising. > You are the first to report nondeterministic behaviour. You're not the only one that is suprised : 1)

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-09 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
2.2.18 sometimes sees 61 GB, sometimes 32 GB. I don't call that hard to understand. The same kernel has varying behaviour? Maybe not hard to understand, but rather surprising. You are the first to report nondeterministic behaviour. You're not the only one that is suprised : 1) Put

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-09 Thread Andries . Brouwer
From: Igmar Palsenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2.18 sometimes sees 61 GB, sometimes 32 GB. I don't call that hard to understand. The same kernel has varying behaviour? Maybe not hard to understand, but rather surprising. You are the first to report

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-08 Thread Andries . Brouwer
> 2.2.18 sometimes sees 61 GB, sometimes 32 GB. > I don't call that hard to understand. The same kernel has varying behaviour? Maybe not hard to understand, but rather surprising. You are the first to report nondeterministic behaviour. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-08 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It's not that simple.. The maxtor comes clipped,. but Linux can't kill the > > clip. So it sticks with 32 MB > > > ibmsetmax.c does a software clip, but that bugs a bit. Sometimes even > > Linux doesn't see 61 GB, but only 32, sometimes the full

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-08 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not that simple.. The maxtor comes clipped,. but Linux can't kill the clip. So it sticks with 32 MB ibmsetmax.c does a software clip, but that bugs a bit. Sometimes even Linux doesn't see 61 GB, but only 32, sometimes the full capacity.

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-08 Thread Andries . Brouwer
2.2.18 sometimes sees 61 GB, sometimes 32 GB. I don't call that hard to understand. The same kernel has varying behaviour? Maybe not hard to understand, but rather surprising. You are the first to report nondeterministic behaviour. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-07 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:34:11AM +0200, Eric Lammerts wrote: > I had the same problem with my 80Gb Maxtor. (Asus P2L97, works with > 60Gb but hangs with 80Gb :-/) After clipping the drive with ibmsetmax > (http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0012.1/0249.html) > and removing the

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-07 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:34:11AM +0200, Eric Lammerts wrote: I had the same problem with my 80Gb Maxtor. (Asus P2L97, works with 60Gb but hangswith 80Gb :-/) After clipping the drive with ibmsetmax (http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0012.1/0249.html) and removing the

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Andries . Brouwer
> It's not that simple.. The maxtor comes clipped,. but Linux can't kill the > clip. So it sticks with 32 MB > ibmsetmax.c does a software clip, but that bugs a bit. Sometimes even > Linux doesn't see 61 GB, but only 32, sometimes the full capacity. Please don't talk vague useless garbage.

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> > Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? > > Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? > > Go set the jumpers right. (anyhow, IBM drives are delivered unclipped, > not sure why Maxtors seem to be) It's not that simple.. The maxtor comes clipped,. but Linux can't kill the clip. So it sticks

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Matthias Andree
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > Ah.. This is a i386 machine, UDMA33 capable, and the bloody thing won't > boot with the clipping removed, and with clipping I can use only 32 GB :(( BIOS update or manual configuration in Standard BIOS configuration required? -- Matthias Andree -

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Matthias Andree
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? > Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? Go set the jumpers right. (anyhow, IBM drives are delivered unclipped, not sure why Maxtors seem to be) -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Matthias Andree
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? Go set the jumpers right. (anyhow, IBM drives are delivered unclipped, not sure why Maxtors seem to be) -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Matthias Andree
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: Ah.. This is a i386 machine, UDMA33 capable, and the bloody thing won't boot with the clipping removed, and with clipping I can use only 32 GB :(( BIOS update or manual configuration in Standard BIOS configuration required? -- Matthias Andree -

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? Go set the jumpers right. (anyhow, IBM drives are delivered unclipped, not sure why Maxtors seem to be) It's not that simple.. The maxtor comes clipped,. but Linux can't kill the clip. So it sticks with

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-06 Thread Andries . Brouwer
It's not that simple.. The maxtor comes clipped,. but Linux can't kill the clip. So it sticks with 32 MB ibmsetmax.c does a software clip, but that bugs a bit. Sometimes even Linux doesn't see 61 GB, but only 32, sometimes the full capacity. Please don't talk vague useless garbage. There is

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Brad Hartin
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > > I had a similar situation except I was more interested in the performance > > difference. Went from ~4MB/s with the 430HX controller to ~12.5MB/s with > > the promise. This on an old Pentium system. > > The network is 10 mbit, so 4 MB/sec is no

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> I had a similar situation except I was more interested in the performance > difference. Went from ~4MB/s with the 430HX controller to ~12.5MB/s with > the promise. This on an old Pentium system. The network is 10 mbit, so 4 MB/sec is no good in this case. I've got the thing running, with

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Tim Wright
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:25:09AM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Torrey Hoffman wrote: > > > I had exactly this problem with the Maxtor 61 GB drive on my > > Pentium based server. Theoretically a BIOS upgrade could fix it, > > but ASUS quit making BIOS upgrades for my

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Andries . Brouwer
> I need to look at fdisk, because it is doing things wrong. I don't think so, unless you have a really old version. > Linux sees the correct size, but fdisk still sees 32 GB. > Probably a recompile / upgrade. Yes, upgrade in case your version is older than 2.10i. Andries - To unsubscribe

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> No. 2.2.* handles large drives since 2.2.14. > This looks more like you used the jumper to clip the drive to 32GB. > Don't use it and get full capacity. > If your BIOS hangs when it sees such a large drive so that you > cannot avoid using the jumper, use setmax in your boot scripts, > or use a

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
No. 2.2.* handles large drives since 2.2.14. This looks more like you used the jumper to clip the drive to 32GB. Don't use it and get full capacity. If your BIOS hangs when it sees such a large drive so that you cannot avoid using the jumper, use setmax in your boot scripts, or use a

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Andries . Brouwer
I need to look at fdisk, because it is doing things wrong. I don't think so, unless you have a really old version. Linux sees the correct size, but fdisk still sees 32 GB. Probably a recompile / upgrade. Yes, upgrade in case your version is older than 2.10i. Andries - To unsubscribe from

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Tim Wright
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:25:09AM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Torrey Hoffman wrote: I had exactly this problem with the Maxtor 61 GB drive on my Pentium based server. Theoretically a BIOS upgrade could fix it, but ASUS quit making BIOS upgrades for my

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-05 Thread Brad Hartin
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: I had a similar situation except I was more interested in the performance difference. Went from ~4MB/s with the 430HX controller to ~12.5MB/s with the promise. This on an old Pentium system. The network is 10 mbit, so 4 MB/sec is no good in

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Andries . Brouwer
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > >> kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : >> hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA >> >> Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63 No. 2.2.* handles large drives since 2.2.14. This looks more like you used the

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Eric Lammerts
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > Yeah.. I removed the clipping, and the machine won't boot. It halts after > PnP init. Any way to use full capacity with the clipping enabled ? I had the same problem with my 80Gb Maxtor. (Asus P2L97, works with 60Gb but hangs with 80Gb :-/) After

RE: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Torrey Hoffman wrote: > I had exactly this problem with the Maxtor 61 GB drive on my > Pentium based server. Theoretically a BIOS upgrade could fix it, > but ASUS quit making BIOS upgrades for my motherboard two years > ago. Ah well, join the club in my case :) > I solved

RE: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Torrey Hoffman
I had exactly this problem with the Maxtor 61 GB drive on my Pentium based server. Theoretically a BIOS upgrade could fix it, but ASUS quit making BIOS upgrades for my motherboard two years ago. I solved the problem by getting a Promise Ultra 100 controller and putting the drive on that. Works

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> I did'nt know something like that even existed :) > > Just plugged the drive into the ide controller (single drive on a > promise ata100 in a dec alpha) and it worked. Ah.. This is a i386 machine, UDMA33 capable, and the bloody thing won't boot with the clipping removed, and with clipping I

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Sven Koch
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. > > Go look at you logs. > > Yep, logs indicate that.. > > Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? > Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? I did'nt know something like that even existed :) Just

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. > Go look at you logs. Yeah.. I removed the clipping, and the machine won't boot. It halts after PnP init. Any way to use full capacity with the clipping enabled ? Regards,

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Hi, Forget the question on killing the drive clipping. I forgot to RTFM :) Regards, Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. > Go look at you logs. Yep, logs indicate that.. Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? Regards, Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. Go look at you logs. On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Sven Koch wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > > kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : > > > > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > > hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache,

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Sven Koch
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : > > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA > > Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63 > > Looks like some short int (2 bytes)

2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) part #2

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Hi, Just tried the ide patches for 2.2.18, and same result :(( Any patches / suggestions I can try ?? Regards, Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read

2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Hi, kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63 Looks like some short int (2 bytes) overflowing. I'll try the ide patches. Regards,

2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Hi, kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63 Looks like some short int (2 bytes) overflowing. I'll try the ide patches. Regards,

2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB) part #2

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Hi, Just tried the ide patches for 2.2.18, and same result :(( Any patches / suggestions I can try ?? Regards, Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Sven Koch
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63 Looks like some short int (2 bytes) overflowing. I'll

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Andre Hedrick
You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. Go look at you logs. On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Sven Koch wrote: On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache,

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. Go look at you logs. Yep, logs indicate that.. Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? Regards, Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Hi, Forget the question on killing the drive clipping. I forgot to RTFM :) Regards, Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote: You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. Go look at you logs. Yeah.. I removed the clipping, and the machine won't boot. It halts after PnP init. Any way to use full capacity with the clipping enabled ? Regards,

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Sven Koch
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. Go look at you logs. Yep, logs indicate that.. Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? I did'nt know something like that even existed :) Just plugged

RE: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Torrey Hoffman wrote: I had exactly this problem with the Maxtor 61 GB drive on my Pentium based server. Theoretically a BIOS upgrade could fix it, but ASUS quit making BIOS upgrades for my motherboard two years ago. Ah well, join the club in my case :) I solved the

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Eric Lammerts
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: Yeah.. I removed the clipping, and the machine won't boot. It halts after PnP init. Any way to use full capacity with the clipping enabled ? I had the same problem with my 80Gb Maxtor. (Asus P2L97, works with 60Gb but hangs with 80Gb :-/) After

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

2001-01-04 Thread Andries . Brouwer
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63 No. 2.2.* handles large drives since 2.2.14. This looks more like you used the jumper to