Re: Kernel 2.2.18 oops

2001-05-30 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 30 May 2001 12:17:55 +0100 (BST), Stephen Cornell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >ksymoops doesn't seem to have done its job correctly ksymoops did the best it could when fed with data that has been stamped on by klogd. Always run klogd as "klogd -x" so it keeps its sticky fingers off the

Kernel 2.2.18 oops

2001-05-30 Thread Stephen Cornell
Sorry, after reading the documentation I couldn't figure out who to send this to. ksymoops doesn't seem to have done its job correctly, but I include the output anyway. The problem seems to have occured during updatedb (creates the slocate file database), which runs daily as a cron job (and has

Kernel 2.2.18 oops

2001-05-30 Thread Stephen Cornell
Sorry, after reading the documentation I couldn't figure out who to send this to. ksymoops doesn't seem to have done its job correctly, but I include the output anyway. The problem seems to have occured during updatedb (creates the slocate file database), which runs daily as a cron job (and has

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 oops

2001-05-30 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 30 May 2001 12:17:55 +0100 (BST), Stephen Cornell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ksymoops doesn't seem to have done its job correctly ksymoops did the best it could when fed with data that has been stamped on by klogd. Always run klogd as klogd -x so it keeps its sticky fingers off the oops

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-28 Thread Camm Maguire
OK, some new information. Apparently, the ethernet traffic is getting corrupted by heavy disk access to the second disk on my primary ALI 5229 controller. I suspect this is related to the oops, as the kernel log messages reporting the errors tend to come roughly at the same time as the oopses.

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-28 Thread Camm Maguire
OK, some new information. Apparently, the ethernet traffic is getting corrupted by heavy disk access to the second disk on my primary ALI 5229 controller. I suspect this is related to the oops, as the kernel log messages reporting the errors tend to come roughly at the same time as the oopses.

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-27 Thread Camm Maguire
Hello again! We're in luck! The oops happened again, and this time, the full oops dump appeared on the screen, which I have copied below: = Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6e617274

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-27 Thread Camm Maguire
Hello again! We're in luck! The oops happened again, and this time, the full oops dump appeared on the screen, which I have copied below: = Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6e617274

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Here are the contiguous lines from kern.log: Mar 21 01:14:47 intech9 kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x57 size=1270 Mar 21 01:14:49 intech9 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address Mar 21 01:14:49 intech9 kernel:

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be happy to generate one if I could. I've got the system > map. The defaults reported by ksymoops are all correct. Don't > know why it didn't give me more info. Normally, the info is > reported by klogd anyway,

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks for your reply! Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> " " == Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep > > This is normal behaviour for an Oops ;-

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Trond Myklebust
>>>>> " " == Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep This is normal behaviour for an Oops ;-) > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > virtual address

PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Please reply directly as I'm in ECN exile from this mailing list! [1.] One line summary of the problem: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep [2.] Full description of the problem/report: Greetings! We have a backup server running 2.2.18, nfs-kernel-server 0.1.9.1-1

PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Please reply directly as I'm in ECN exile from this mailing list! [1.] One line summary of the problem: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep [2.] Full description of the problem/report: Greetings! We have a backup server running 2.2.18, nfs-kernel-server 0.1.9.1-1

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep This is normal behaviour for an Oops ;-) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address current- tss.cr3 = 02872000, %%cr3

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd be happy to generate one if I could. I've got the system map. The defaults reported by ksymoops are all correct. Don't know why it didn't give me more info. Normally, the info is reported by klogd anyway, but not

Re: PROBLEM: 2.2.18 oops leaves umount hung in disk sleep

2001-03-22 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Here are the contiguous lines from kern.log: Mar 21 01:14:47 intech9 kernel: eth0: bogus packet: status=0x80 nxpg=0x57 size=1270 Mar 21 01:14:49 intech9 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address Mar 21 01:14:49 intech9 kernel:

[2.2.18] Oops in schedule/reschedule

2001-01-10 Thread Mike Frisch
[1.] One line summary of the problem: Oops in schedule [2.] Full description of the problem/report: I am unsure of the actual cause. My machine is running Postfix and INN and both were killed when the oops occurred. These are the only two tasks that appear to have died. [3.] Keywords

[2.2.18] Oops in schedule/reschedule

2001-01-10 Thread Mike Frisch
[1.] One line summary of the problem: Oops in schedule [2.] Full description of the problem/report: I am unsure of the actual cause. My machine is running Postfix and INN and both were killed when the oops occurred. These are the only two tasks that appear to have died. [3.] Keywords

2.2.18 Oops..

2000-12-30 Thread Mike A. Harris
Dist: Red Hat 7.0 Kernel: Using 2.2.18 + IDE patches. My lilo.conf: boot=/dev/hda map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot.b prompt #timeout=50 message=/boot/message default=linux vga=ext image=/boot/bzImage-2.2.18-1NSRI label=linux read-only root=/dev/hda3

2.2.18 oops

2000-12-30 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
Hello! I have problems with kernels >=2.2.15 Always have similar oops about 1-2 times per week. 2.2.13 works good for me, but now I need big ide drive support. I don't tried 2.2.14 yet, but looks like bug is in 2.2.14 and greater. I have dual processors server with 5 eepro100 interfaces (2 cards

2.2.18 oops

2000-12-30 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
Hello! I have problems with kernels =2.2.15 Always have similar oops about 1-2 times per week. 2.2.13 works good for me, but now I need big ide drive support. I don't tried 2.2.14 yet, but looks like bug is in 2.2.14 and greater. I have dual processors server with 5 eepro100 interfaces (2 cards

2.2.18 Oops..

2000-12-30 Thread Mike A. Harris
Dist: Red Hat 7.0 Kernel: Using 2.2.18 + IDE patches. My lilo.conf: boot=/dev/hda map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot.b prompt #timeout=50 message=/boot/message default=linux vga=ext image=/boot/bzImage-2.2.18-1NSRI label=linux read-only root=/dev/hda3