According to Jeff Garzik:
> The correct fix is a much larger patch which changes char2uni's
> declaration to include const, and then all the changes that trickle down
> from there.
I didn't want to presume to change an API like that, even an internal
one. But of course Alan can, and I'm quite
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:29:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Im intentionally avoiding these right now. The 2.2.18 kernel has a very large
> amount of updates to drivers/extra functionality. I don't want to mix any of
> that with core internal changes of any kind. The VM fixes in paticular look
>
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> 3. Trivial patch to fs/vfat/namei.c to avoid a compile-time warning.
>
> Index: linux/fs/vfat/namei.c
> --- linux/fs/vfat/namei.c:1.2 Fri Sep 1 19:03:16 2000
> +++ linux/fs/vfat/namei.c Thu Sep 28 00:53:55 2000
> @@ -676,7 +676,8 @@
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Here's a brace of small patches that ought to be OK for 2.2.18.
> adTHANKSvance for consideration
> 3. Trivial patch to fs/vfat/namei.c to avoid a compile-time warning.
> Index: linux/fs/vfat/namei.c
> --- linux/fs/vfat/namei.c:1.2 Fri Sep 1 19:03:16
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Here's a brace of small patches that ought to be OK for 2.2.18.
adTHANKSvance for consideration
3. Trivial patch to fs/vfat/namei.c to avoid a compile-time warning.
Index: linux/fs/vfat/namei.c
--- linux/fs/vfat/namei.c:1.2 Fri Sep 1 19:03:16 2000
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:29:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Im intentionally avoiding these right now. The 2.2.18 kernel has a very large
amount of updates to drivers/extra functionality. I don't want to mix any of
that with core internal changes of any kind. The VM fixes in paticular look
good
According to Jeff Garzik:
The correct fix is a much larger patch which changes char2uni's
declaration to include const, and then all the changes that trickle down
from there.
I didn't want to presume to change an API like that, even an internal
one. But of course Alan can, and I'm quite glad
> I suppose I should let Andrea submit these, but he has such a huge
> patch collection (thank you!) that I thought it might be useful to
> pick out some of the smaller ones that would be less controversial
> for inclusion in the main kernel.
Im intentionally avoiding these right now. The 2.2.18
I suppose I should let Andrea submit these, but he has such a huge
patch collection (thank you!) that I thought it might be useful to
pick out some of the smaller ones that would be less controversial
for inclusion in the main kernel.
* nanosleep-4
Provide nanosleep usec resolution so that
Here's a brace of small patches that ought to be OK for 2.2.18.
adTHANKSvance for consideration
1. Fix fencepost error in ioremap's page reservation logic.
(I think the broken logic was added to support AGP.)
Index: linux/arch/i386/mm/ioremap.c
--- linux/arch/i386/mm/ioremap.c:1.2Fri Sep
Here's a brace of small patches that ought to be OK for 2.2.18.
adTHANKSvance for consideration
1. Fix fencepost error in ioremap's page reservation logic.
(I think the broken logic was added to support AGP.)
Index: linux/arch/i386/mm/ioremap.c
--- linux/arch/i386/mm/ioremap.c:1.2Fri Sep
I suppose I should let Andrea submit these, but he has such a huge
patch collection (thank you!) that I thought it might be useful to
pick out some of the smaller ones that would be less controversial
for inclusion in the main kernel.
* nanosleep-4
Provide nanosleep usec resolution so that
I suppose I should let Andrea submit these, but he has such a huge
patch collection (thank you!) that I thought it might be useful to
pick out some of the smaller ones that would be less controversial
for inclusion in the main kernel.
Im intentionally avoiding these right now. The 2.2.18
13 matches
Mail list logo
