Re: 2.4.0-test10 oops

2000-11-11 Thread Ben Chu
Jan Dvorak said: > > Hi, > > attached oops came from writing to vfat fs. This problem was brought up a couple of times before as referenced here http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0010.3/0652.html http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0006.1/1754.html http://www.uws

2.4.0-test10 oops

2000-11-09 Thread Jan Dvorak
Hi, attached oops came from writing to vfat fs. Jan Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ksymoops 2.3.5 on i686 2.4.0-test10. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test10/ (default) -m /boot/System.map (specified)

Re: 2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-08 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:00:50PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > >>EIP; c68385ab <[3c509].text.start+54b/6e8> <= > Trace; 0499 > Trace; c683935b <[3c509]init_module+57/74> [...] > 3c509 7408 1 (initializing) I think this is a known problem and has been fixed

Re: fs problem in 2.4.0-test10 -- oops in directory access

2000-11-07 Thread Matthew Hanselman
Many apologies, it's late and I ran the default ksymoops (0.7c) instead of ./ksymoops However, after running the real ksymoops against it, it gives nothing new; I suppose since 'ls' is dying and the stack is from 'ls', that's why. Is there anything else I should do before booting back to a 2.2.

Re: fs problem in 2.4.0-test10 -- oops in directory access

2000-11-07 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 00:38:33 -0600 (CST), Matthew Hanselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I can poke around tomorrow morning without a reboot, but then I'll have to >reboot (so please respond via email if I can do anything). I tried >grinding the message through ksymoops-2.3.5, and it complains wit

fs problem in 2.4.0-test10 -- oops in directory access

2000-11-07 Thread Matthew Hanselman
I have a directory on my local filesystem that I cannot access on 2.4.0-test10. It happens when I try to "ls" in this bad directory, and ls segfaults. I can poke around tomorrow morning without a reboot, but then I'll have to reboot (so please respond via email if I can do anything). I tried gr

Re: 2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-07 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 02:19:05PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:03:44 +0100, > Frank van Maarseveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >First a firewall is installed (ppp0). Starting the network (eth0/lo only. ppp0 is > >nonexistent at this point) gives the following Oops: > > klo

Re: 2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-06 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:03:44 +0100, Frank van Maarseveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >First a firewall is installed (ppp0). Starting the network (eth0/lo only. ppp0 is >nonexistent at this point) gives the following Oops: >Nov 6 22:20:25 iapetus kernel: EIP: >0010:[ipt_REJECT:__insmod_ipt_REJE

2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-06 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
First a firewall is installed (ppp0). Starting the network (eth0/lo only. ppp0 is nonexistent at this point) gives the following Oops: ksymoops 2.3.3 on i686 2.4.0-test10-x23. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.0-

2.4.0-test10 Oops

2000-11-02 Thread Burton Windle
would not compile ksymoops, so I had to reboot to compile/run it. [3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel): 2.4.0-test10 oops [4.] Kernel version (from /proc/version): Linux version 2.4.0-test10 (root@toy) (gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux)) #3 Wed Nov 1 23:29:21 EST 2000 [5