On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:44:02PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
Dag Frank -
I see lots of messages from you about corruption in 2.4.0-test11
but we all know very well that 2.4.0-test11 corrupts things
and further evidence is not necessary.
Hopefully all, or at least the most significant,
After removing 128MB, leaving the original 64MB in the main board:
+ tar xzf /home/fvm/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.0-test10.tar.gz
+ bzcat /home/fvm/kernel/v2.4/patch-2.4.0-test11.bz2
+ patch -p0 -s
+ zcat /home/fvm/kernel/v2.4/test12-pre7.gz
+ patch -p0 -s
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
After removing 128MB, leaving the original 64MB in the main board:
+ tar xzf /home/fvm/kernel/v2.4/linux-2.4.0-test10.tar.gz
+ bzcat /home/fvm/kernel/v2.4/patch-2.4.0-test11.bz2
+ patch -p0 -s
+ zcat /home/fvm/kernel/v2.4/test12-pre7.gz
+ patch -p0 -s
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:44:02PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
Dag Frank -
I see lots of messages from you about corruption in 2.4.0-test11
but we all know very well that 2.4.0-test11 corrupts things
and further evidence is not necessary.
Hopefully all, or at least the most significant,
4 matches
Mail list logo