On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Now, will the two people in the world who know the pirq black magic now
> stand up and confirm or deride my interpretation?
since I'm certainly not the other one, I'm not going to confirm it ;-)
But, besides it sounds reasonable, I could give some
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Now, will the two people in the world who know the pirq black magic now
stand up and confirm or deride my interpretation?
since I'm certainly not the other one, I'm not going to confirm it ;-)
But, besides it sounds reasonable, I could give some more
> Despite the latest ACPI update, I still get the ACPI slowdown on
> initialisation which started with the -pre10 changes. Also, the uhci
> module doesn't work for me (the latest patch from Johannes
> Erdfelt does
> work). This is an Abit KA7-100, which has the KX133 chipset. Here is
> the
> The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless
> you happen to be hit by just that detail.. As always, fedback is
> appreciated.
>
> Linus
>
>
>
> pre12:
> - Get non-cpuid Cyrix probing right (it's not a NexGen)
> - Jens Axboe: cdrom tray
| > Problem still exists, diffed to last kernel:
| Yes. But everything works for you, no? Including USB?
Mmmhmm..
| The problem is that you have this routing table entry:
|
| 00:01 slot=00 0:62/1eb8 1:00/ 2:00/ 3:00/
|
| which is really for the USB chip (PCI id 00:01.2), and which
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Aaron Tiensivu wrote:
>
> Problem still exists, diffed to last kernel:
Yes. But everything works for you, no? Including USB?
The problem is that you have this routing table entry:
00:01 slot=00 0:62/1eb8 1:00/ 2:00/ 3:00/
which is really for the USB
| Could people that had problems with SiS interrupt handling before please
| give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
| of pirq tables from people, and Martin Diehl put them together with the
| hardware specs to come up with what looks to be the "final and
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
[...]
> The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless
[...]
> Linus
Seems that even you are still confused with -testXX and -preXX
Could people that had problems with SiS interrupt handling before please
give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
of pirq tables from people, and Martin Diehl put them together with the
hardware specs to come up with what looks to be the "final and correct"
SiS
Could people that had problems with SiS interrupt handling before please
give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
of pirq tables from people, and Martin Diehl put them together with the
hardware specs to come up with what looks to be the "final and correct"
SiS
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
[...]
The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless
[...]
Linus
Seems that even you are still confused with -testXX and -preXX ;)
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Aaron Tiensivu wrote:
Problem still exists, diffed to last kernel:
Yes. But everything works for you, no? Including USB?
The problem is that you have this routing table entry:
00:01 slot=00 0:62/1eb8 1:00/ 2:00/ 3:00/
which is really for the USB
| Problem still exists, diffed to last kernel:
| Yes. But everything works for you, no? Including USB?
Mmmhmm..
| The problem is that you have this routing table entry:
|
| 00:01 slot=00 0:62/1eb8 1:00/ 2:00/ 3:00/
|
| which is really for the USB chip (PCI id 00:01.2), and which
Despite the latest ACPI update, I still get the ACPI slowdown on
initialisation which started with the -pre10 changes. Also, the uhci
module doesn't work for me (the latest patch from Johannes
Erdfelt does
work). This is an Abit KA7-100, which has the KX133 chipset. Here is
the dmesg
14 matches
Mail list logo
