Re: 2.4.0-test9 module sd.o didn't get installed

2000-10-04 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Lee Mitchell wrote: > Compiled 2.4.0-test9 with an aic7xxx card (all scsi stuff compiled as > modules). > > make modules_install did not install the module sd.o as i found out when > rebooting. The scsi disk (sd) module has been named "sd_mod.o" for some time but in July this year in the

Re: 2.4.0-test9 module sd.o didn't get installed

2000-10-04 Thread Lee Mitchell
5 PM Subject: 2.4.0-test9 module sd.o didn't get installed > Compiled 2.4.0-test9 with an aic7xxx card (all scsi stuff compiled as > modules). > > make modules_install did not install the module sd.o as i found out when > rebooting. > > copying the file manually from the ker

2.4.0-test9 module sd.o didn't get installed

2000-10-04 Thread Lee Mitchell
Compiled 2.4.0-test9 with an aic7xxx card (all scsi stuff compiled as modules). make modules_install did not install the module sd.o as i found out when rebooting. copying the file manually from the kernel source tree fixed it. Lee Mitchell www.spamtastic.demon.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: 2.4.0-test9 module sd.o didn't get installed

2000-10-04 Thread Lee Mitchell
-test9 module sd.o didn't get installed Compiled 2.4.0-test9 with an aic7xxx card (all scsi stuff compiled as modules). make modules_install did not install the module sd.o as i found out when rebooting. copying the file manually from the kernel source tree fixed it. Lee Mitchell

Re: 2.4.0-test9 module sd.o didn't get installed

2000-10-04 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Lee Mitchell wrote: Compiled 2.4.0-test9 with an aic7xxx card (all scsi stuff compiled as modules). make modules_install did not install the module sd.o as i found out when rebooting. The scsi disk (sd) module has been named "sd_mod.o" for some time but in July this year in the development