David Ford writes:
> "Michael J. Dikkema" wrote:
>
> > I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> > filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> > thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
> > tree.. is the legacy
David Ford writes:
"Michael J. Dikkema" wrote:
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1
> image=/boot/bzImage
> label=linux
> append="root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 vga=3845"
root=/dev/ide/host will work the same as root=/dev/hda... in pre-devfs
-d
--
There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and
talents. Thomas Jefferson
The
- Original Message -
From: "David Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael J. Dikkema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)
> "Micha
- Original Message -
From: "David Ford" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Michael J. Dikkema" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)
"Michael J. Dikkema" wrote:
image=/boot/bzImage
label=linux
append="root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 vga=3845"
root=/dev/ide/host will work the same as root=/dev/hda... in pre-devfs
-d
--
There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and
talents. Thomas Jefferson
The
"Michael J. Dikkema" wrote:
> I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
> tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still
John Jasen wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> > [Michael J. Dikkema]
> > > > I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> > > > filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> > > > thinking there might have been a change
[John Jasen]
> E upon careful reading of the devfs/devfsd documentation,
> you'll find that it says to put /sbin/devfsd /dev in amongst the
> first lines in rc.sysinit.
> In looking through rc.sysinit, / is not mounted rw until much later.
Who said anything about *re*-mounting '/'?
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Michael J. Dikkema]
> > > I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> > > filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> > > thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
> > >
[Michael J. Dikkema]
> > I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> > filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> > thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
> > tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
> I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
> tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still
[Michael J. Dikkema]
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still /dev/discs/disc0/part1?
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Michael J. Dikkema]
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is
[John Jasen]
E upon careful reading of the devfs/devfsd documentation,
you'll find that it says to put /sbin/devfsd /dev in amongst the
first lines in rc.sysinit.
In looking through rc.sysinit, / is not mounted rw until much later.
Who said anything about *re*-mounting '/'? We
John Jasen wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Michael J. Dikkema]
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to
"Michael J. Dikkema" wrote:
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
>
> I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
> filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
> thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
> tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still /dev/discs/disc0/part1?
I can't even get a shell with
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still /dev/discs/disc0/part1?
I can't even get a shell with
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Michael J. Dikkema wrote:
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and was surprised that either the root
filesystem wasn't mounted, or it couldn't be read. I'm using devfs.. I'm
thinking there might have been a change with regards to the devfs
tree.. is the legacy /dev/hda1 still
22 matches
Mail list logo
