RE: 2.4.1 eats RAM or /proc/meminfo bug

2001-02-03 Thread Ricardo Galli
> you should give up thinking there's any real relation between 2.2 > and 2.4. yes, they're both Linux, but their behaviors are essentially > unrelated. > > > total used free sharedbuffers >cached > > Mem:255340 232444 22896 0

2.4.1 eats RAM or /proc/meminfo bug

2001-02-03 Thread Ricardo Galli
I noticed in my server that the memory consumption with 2.4.1 it much higher than 2.2.18 and it gets worse over time. Free was reporting up to 140MB of RAM with no user/X session (50-60MB with 2.2.18, same software). I've upgraded to procps 2.0.7, but the problem persists. After few minutes of

2.4.1 eats RAM or /proc/meminfo bug

2001-02-03 Thread Ricardo Galli
I noticed in my server that the memory consumption with 2.4.1 it much higher than 2.2.18 and it gets worse over time. Free was reporting up to 140MB of RAM with no user/X session (50-60MB with 2.2.18, same software). I've upgraded to procps 2.0.7, but the problem persists. After few minutes of

RE: 2.4.1 eats RAM or /proc/meminfo bug

2001-02-03 Thread Ricardo Galli
you should give up thinking there's any real relation between 2.2 and 2.4. yes, they're both Linux, but their behaviors are essentially unrelated. total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem:255340 232444 22896 0 16988