On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Thanks Andrew, I appreciate your note. I'll try it again with 509 as a module.
I had forgotten about linkage order problems.
> al goldstein wrote:
> >
> > I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
> > at boot in lilo.conf.
al goldstein wrote:
>
> I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
> at boot in lilo.conf. Using this same config in 2.4.1 results in
> the hardware addresses for the cards to be swapped. If I remove 509 from
> Lilo I get the same result. Suggestions would be
al goldstein wrote:
I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
at boot in lilo.conf. Using this same config in 2.4.1 results in
the hardware addresses for the cards to be swapped. If I remove 509 from
Lilo I get the same result. Suggestions would be appreciated
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Thanks Andrew, I appreciate your note. I'll try it again with 509 as a module.
I had forgotten about linkage order problems.
al goldstein wrote:
I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
at boot in lilo.conf. Using
I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
at boot in lilo.conf. Using this same config in 2.4.1 results in
the hardware addresses for the cards to be swapped. If I remove 509 from
Lilo I get the same result. Suggestions would be appreciated
-
To unsubscribe from
I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
at boot in lilo.conf. Using this same config in 2.4.1 results in
the hardware addresses for the cards to be swapped. If I remove 509 from
Lilo I get the same result. Suggestions would be appreciated
-
To unsubscribe from
6 matches
Mail list logo