[Partially solved] Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-13 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, William. On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: > Your 'dmesg' says > Warning: Secondary channel requires an 80-pin cable for operation. > I assume it is. Well, I just finished compiling the 2.6.11-rc4 kernel and the problem persisted. This time, I enabled ACPI debugging and it indeed

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-13 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: > Do you have MSI on by any chance? (CONFIG_PCI_MSI) If so, try kernel > without it. My motherboard exhibits runaway IRQ with it. Ok, now I've just downloaded the -rc4 patch and while selecting the options to compile, I saw what MSI means. No, I didn't have

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-13 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:50:43PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: > > To prevent the matters of loosing track of what is being done, I only > > changed one option at a time. I put the dmesg logs of all my attempts > > at

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-13 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:50:43PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: To prevent the matters of loosing track of what is being done, I only changed one option at a time. I put the dmesg logs of all my attempts at http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/ide-problem/.

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-13 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: Do you have MSI on by any chance? (CONFIG_PCI_MSI) If so, try kernel without it. My motherboard exhibits runaway IRQ with it. Ok, now I've just downloaded the -rc4 patch and while selecting the options to compile, I saw what MSI means. No, I didn't have

[Partially solved] Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-13 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, William. On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: Your 'dmesg' says Warning: Secondary channel requires an 80-pin cable for operation. I assume it is. Well, I just finished compiling the 2.6.11-rc4 kernel and the problem persisted. This time, I enabled ACPI debugging and it indeed

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread William Park
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:50:43PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: > On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: > > This looks awefully like 'acpi' is on. If 'acpi=noirq' does not work, > > then try 'pci=noacpi'. > > Hi, Willian. > > First of all, thank you very much for both your attention and help. > >

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: > This looks awefully like 'acpi' is on. If 'acpi=noirq' does not work, > then try 'pci=noacpi'. Hi, Willian. First of all, thank you very much for both your attention and help. Unfortunately, I have already tried booting the 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 that I just

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread William Park
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:47:15PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: > On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:45:58PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: > > > For some kernel versions (say, since 2.6.10 proper, all the 2.6.11-rc's, > > > some -mm trees and also -ac) I have been

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:45:58PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: > > For some kernel versions (say, since 2.6.10 proper, all the 2.6.11-rc's, > > some -mm trees and also -ac) I have been getting the message "irq 10: > > nobody cared!". > > Try 'acpi=noirq'.

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread William Park
he dmesg log of my system with this message. I am CC'ing > the linux-ide list, but I'm only subscribed to linux-kernel. I would > appreciate CC's, if possible. > > > Thank you very much for any help, Rog?rio. > > P.S.: I am, right now, re-compiling 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 wi

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread William Park
subscribed to linux-kernel. I would appreciate CC's, if possible. Thank you very much for any help, Rog?rio. P.S.: I am, right now, re-compiling 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 with the extra pass of kallsyms to see if the problem persists with this release. Try 'acpi=noirq'. -- William Park [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread William Park
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:47:15PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:45:58PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: For some kernel versions (say, since 2.6.10 proper, all the 2.6.11-rc's, some -mm trees and also -ac) I have been getting the

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: This looks awefully like 'acpi' is on. If 'acpi=noirq' does not work, then try 'pci=noacpi'. Hi, Willian. First of all, thank you very much for both your attention and help. Unfortunately, I have already tried booting the 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 that I just

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread William Park
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:50:43PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: This looks awefully like 'acpi' is on. If 'acpi=noirq' does not work, then try 'pci=noacpi'. Hi, Willian. First of all, thank you very much for both your attention and help.

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 12 2005, William Park wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:45:58PM -0200, Rog?rio Brito wrote: For some kernel versions (say, since 2.6.10 proper, all the 2.6.11-rc's, some -mm trees and also -ac) I have been getting the message irq 10: nobody cared!. Try 'acpi=noirq'.

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-09 Thread Barry K. Nathan
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 08:12:07PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > (I understand that it's only a "proof of concept" patch, but I thought I'd > bitch anyway ;)) > > So. I'll keep the patch as-is in -mm for now. I've Cc'ed linux-acpi. > Perhaps the people there can absorb this and fix it up for

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-09 Thread Andrew Morton
"Marcos D. Marado Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old > acpi_power_off bug... > > ... > diff -Nru -p1 linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c > linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mbn1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c > ---

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume [update]

2005-02-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
d the warining. > > > > > > BTW, I've also tried to put touch_softlockup_watchdog() before > > > device_power_up(), but it didn't change much. > > > > this is a single-CPU box, right? > > Yes. > > OK, I think I've sorted it out. The solution is to u

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
vice_power_up(), but it didn't change much. > > this is a single-CPU box, right? Yes. OK, I think I've sorted it out. The solution is to use your patch and the following change against swsusp.c: --- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-08 18:16:34.0 +010

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-09 Thread Barry K. Nathan
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:54:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Marcos D. Marado Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old > > acpi_power_off bug... > > What acpi_power_off bug? And how does it solve it? Here's the observed

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-09 Thread Barry K. Nathan
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:54:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Marcos D. Marado Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old acpi_power_off bug... What acpi_power_off bug? And how does it solve it? Here's the observed bug that the

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
I've sorted it out. The solution is to use your patch and the following change against swsusp.c: --- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-08 18:16:34.0 +0100 +++ new/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-09 17:31:16.0 +0100 @@ -870,7 +870,9 @@ /* Restore

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume [update]

2005-02-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
(), but it didn't change much. this is a single-CPU box, right? Yes. OK, I think I've sorted it out. The solution is to use your patch and the following change against swsusp.c: Well, I was to quick with this, sorry. --- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-08 18:16

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-09 Thread Andrew Morton
Marcos D. Marado Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old acpi_power_off bug... ... diff -Nru -p1 linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mbn1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c ---

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-09 Thread Barry K. Nathan
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 08:12:07PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: (I understand that it's only a proof of concept patch, but I thought I'd bitch anyway ;)) So. I'll keep the patch as-is in -mm for now. I've Cc'ed linux-acpi. Perhaps the people there can absorb this and fix it up for real,

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: two oops on startup

2005-02-08 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/09/2005 03:09 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>during startup I get too oops on my Box > > > Yes, it is being worked on. You'll need to CONFIG_INOTIFY=n, thanks. okay, thanks. - -- [ Clemens

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: two oops on startup

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > during startup I get too oops on my Box Yes, it is being worked on. You'll need to CONFIG_INOTIFY=n, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: two oops on startup

2005-02-08 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ] [ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ] [ http://www.tequila.co.jphttp://www.tbwajapan.co.jp ] # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 # Wed Feb 9 12:39:10 2005 # CONF

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Zwane Mwaikambo
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ > > Andrew, >

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
"Marcos D. Marado Torres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old > acpi_power_off bug... What acpi_power_off bug? And how does it solve it? Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Marcos D. Marado Torres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ Andrew, Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old acpi_power_off bug... Best Regards, Marcos

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Peter Osterlund
init seg:1 page:df404000 filename: len:4096 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address printing eip: c01d8257 *pde = Oops: [#1] PREEMPT Modules linked in: CPU:0 EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI EFL

Re: [PATCH] fix ACPI_BOOT for ia64 (2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-08 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:03:38PM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > One of your patches in 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 breaks ACPI_BOOT for ia64. It > removes the dependence on CONFIG_ACPI and makes it exclusively depend on > X86_HT, which is wrong. Thanks for the patch. A

[PATCH] fix ACPI_BOOT for ia64 (2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-08 Thread Martin Hicks
Hi Andrew, One of your patches in 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 breaks ACPI_BOOT for ia64. It removes the dependence on CONFIG_ACPI and makes it exclusively depend on X86_HT, which is wrong. Signed-off-by: Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/drivers/acpi/K

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] add TANBAC TB0219 base board driver

2005-02-08 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch adds GPIO/LED/DIPSW driver for TANBAC TB0219. Yoichi Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN -X dontdiff a-orig/arch/mips/Kconfig a/arch/mips/Kconfig --- a-orig/arch/mips/KconfigTue Feb 8 00:19:49 2005 +++ a/arch/mips/Kconfig Tue Feb 8 00:53:47 2005 @@ -122,10

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The warning is printed right after the image is restored (ie somewhere > around the local_irq_enable() above, but it goes before the "PM: Image > restored successfully." message that is printed as soon as the return > is executed). Definitely,

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Feb 08 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ->axboe! > > > > :-) > > > > The thing wants a rewrite. Ideally the serializing point would be a > > special request. The patch is still better than nothing right now, it's > > really easy

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >->axboe! > > :-) > > The thing wants a rewrite. Ideally the serializing point would be a > special request. The patch is still better than nothing right now, it's > really easy to hang the device with hdparm in -linus since it's >

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Feb 08 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > Maciej Soltysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady > > SeekComplete Error } > > Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError > > BadCRC } > > Feb 6

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Maciej Soltysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady > SeekComplete Error } > Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError > BadCRC } > Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown > Feb

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] Relay Fork Module

2005-02-08 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >This module sends a signal to one or several processes (in user > > space) when a fork occurs in the kernel. It relays information about > > forks (parent and child pid) to a user

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] Relay Fork Module

2005-02-08 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Guillaume Thouvenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This module sends a signal to one or several processes (in user space) when a fork occurs in the kernel. It relays information about forks (parent and child pid) to a user space

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Maciej Soltysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown Feb 6

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Feb 08 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: Maciej Soltysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } Feb 6 17:07:47 dns

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -axboe! :-) The thing wants a rewrite. Ideally the serializing point would be a special request. The patch is still better than nothing right now, it's really easy to hang the device with hdparm in -linus since it's impossible to

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-08 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Feb 08 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -axboe! :-) The thing wants a rewrite. Ideally the serializing point would be a special request. The patch is still better than nothing right now, it's really easy to hang the device

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The warning is printed right after the image is restored (ie somewhere around the local_irq_enable() above, but it goes before the PM: Image restored successfully. message that is printed as soon as the return is executed). Definitely, less than

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] add TANBAC TB0219 base board driver

2005-02-08 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch adds GPIO/LED/DIPSW driver for TANBAC TB0219. Yoichi Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urN -X dontdiff a-orig/arch/mips/Kconfig a/arch/mips/Kconfig --- a-orig/arch/mips/KconfigTue Feb 8 00:19:49 2005 +++ a/arch/mips/Kconfig Tue Feb 8 00:53:47 2005 @@ -122,10

[PATCH] fix ACPI_BOOT for ia64 (2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-08 Thread Martin Hicks
Hi Andrew, One of your patches in 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 breaks ACPI_BOOT for ia64. It removes the dependence on CONFIG_ACPI and makes it exclusively depend on X86_HT, which is wrong. Signed-off-by: Martin Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/drivers/acpi/Kconfig

Re: [PATCH] fix ACPI_BOOT for ia64 (2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-08 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:03:38PM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote: Hi Andrew, One of your patches in 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 breaks ACPI_BOOT for ia64. It removes the dependence on CONFIG_ACPI and makes it exclusively depend on X86_HT, which is wrong. Thanks for the patch. Already fixed in my kconfig

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Peter Osterlund
Modules linked in: CPU:0 EIP:0060:[c01d8257]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010206 (2.6.11-rc3-mm1) EIP is at strncpy_from_user+0x33/0x47 eax: c14f ebx: fff2 ecx: 1000 edx: 1000 esi: edi: df404000 ebp: esp: c14f1f60

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Marcos D. Marado Torres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ Andrew, Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old acpi_power_off bug... Best Regards, Marcos

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Marcos D. Marado Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old acpi_power_off bug... What acpi_power_off bug? And how does it solve it? Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-08 Thread Zwane Mwaikambo
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ Andrew, Please add to -mm the patch in attachment

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: two oops on startup

2005-02-08 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ] [ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ] [ http://www.tequila.co.jphttp://www.tbwajapan.co.jp ] # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 # Wed Feb 9 12:39:10 2005 # CONFIG_X86=y

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: two oops on startup

2005-02-08 Thread Andrew Morton
Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: during startup I get too oops on my Box Yes, it is being worked on. You'll need to CONFIG_INOTIFY=n, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: two oops on startup

2005-02-08 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/09/2005 03:09 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: Clemens Schwaighofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: during startup I get too oops on my Box Yes, it is being worked on. You'll need to CONFIG_INOTIFY=n, thanks. okay, thanks. - -- [ Clemens

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] Relay Fork Module

2005-02-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > >This module sends a signal to one or several processes (in user > space) when a fork occurs in the kernel. It relays information about > forks (parent and child pid) to a user space application. > > ... >This patch is used

Re[2]: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-07 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
Hello Hans, Monday, February 7, 2005, 9:19:47 PM, you wrote: > Maciej Soltysiak wrote: >>) >> >>Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady >>SeekComplete Error } >>Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError >>BadCRC } >> >> > this means

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-07 Thread Hans Reiser
Maciej Soltysiak wrote: ) Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } this means bad hard drive, or at least a bad sector on it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-07 Thread Robert Love
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: > > > > EIP is a strncpy_from_user+0x33/0x47 > > > > ... > > > > Call Trace: > > > > getname+0x69/0xa5 > > > > sys_open+0x12/0xc6 > > > > sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x75 > > > > ... >

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] pcmcia: update vrc4171_card

2005-02-07 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch updates vrc4171 pcmcia driver. Yoichi Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN -X dontdiff a-orig/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile a/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile --- a-orig/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile Thu Feb 3 10:55:52 2005 +++

[RFC][PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] Relay Fork Module

2005-02-07 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
in the kernel. This patch is used by the Enhanced Linux System Accounting tool that can be downloaded from http://elsa.sf.net Regards, Guillaume $ diffstat linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-relayfork.patch include/linux/generic_hooks.h |9 init/Kconfig | 25 ++ kernel/Makefile

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] mips: add unknown page size string

2005-02-07 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch had fixed the following warning. arch/mips/lib-32/dump_tlb.c: In function 'dump_tlb': arch/mips/lib-32/dump_tlb.c:69: warning: control may reach end of non-void function 'msk2str' being inlined This patch adds return value, when page size is not match. Yoichi Signed-off-by: Yoichi

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
gt; I did: > > > > --- > > /home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c > > 2005-02-05 20:57:03.0 +0100 > > +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-06 > > 19:07:39.0 +0100 &

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 - broken bttv ?

2005-02-07 Thread Paulo Marques
Paulo Marques wrote: jjluza wrote: Eyal Lebedinsky wrote I am having bttv problems with vanilla -rc3. Does it work for you? I don't know, as I said I didn't test kernel between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11-rc3-mm1. Sorry. If I have time enough later, I can test 2.6.11-rc3. Since I don't really know if it's

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 - broken bttv ?

2005-02-07 Thread Paulo Marques
jjluza wrote: Eyal Lebedinsky wrote I am having bttv problems with vanilla -rc3. Does it work for you? I don't know, as I said I didn't test kernel between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11-rc3-mm1. Sorry. If I have time enough later, I can test 2.6.11-rc3. Since I don't really know if it's the good place

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to > > the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)? > > I did: > > --- > /home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/po

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)? I did: --- /home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-05 20:57

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 - broken bttv ?

2005-02-07 Thread Paulo Marques
jjluza wrote: Eyal Lebedinsky wrote I am having bttv problems with vanilla -rc3. Does it work for you? I don't know, as I said I didn't test kernel between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11-rc3-mm1. Sorry. If I have time enough later, I can test 2.6.11-rc3. Since I don't really know if it's the good place

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 - broken bttv ?

2005-02-07 Thread Paulo Marques
Paulo Marques wrote: jjluza wrote: Eyal Lebedinsky wrote I am having bttv problems with vanilla -rc3. Does it work for you? I don't know, as I said I didn't test kernel between 2.6.10 and 2.6.11-rc3-mm1. Sorry. If I have time enough later, I can test 2.6.11-rc3. Since I don't really know if it's

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-05 20:57:03.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-06 19:07:39.0 +0100 @@ -871,6 +869,7 @@ restore_processor_state(); restore_highmem(); device_power_up

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] mips: add unknown page size string

2005-02-07 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch had fixed the following warning. arch/mips/lib-32/dump_tlb.c: In function 'dump_tlb': arch/mips/lib-32/dump_tlb.c:69: warning: control may reach end of non-void function 'msk2str' being inlined This patch adds return value, when page size is not match. Yoichi Signed-off-by: Yoichi

[RFC][PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] Relay Fork Module

2005-02-07 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
that can be downloaded from http://elsa.sf.net Regards, Guillaume $ diffstat linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-relayfork.patch include/linux/generic_hooks.h |9 init/Kconfig | 25 ++ kernel/Makefile |1 kernel/fork.c | 27 ++ kernel/relay_fork.c

[PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] pcmcia: update vrc4171_card

2005-02-07 Thread Yoichi Yuasa
This patch updates vrc4171 pcmcia driver. Yoichi Signed-off-by: Yoichi Yuasa [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urN -X dontdiff a-orig/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile a/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile --- a-orig/arch/mips/vr41xx/common/Makefile Thu Feb 3 10:55:52 2005 +++

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-07 Thread Robert Love
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: EIP is a strncpy_from_user+0x33/0x47 ... Call Trace: getname+0x69/0xa5 sys_open+0x12/0xc6 sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x75 ... Kernel panic - not

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-07 Thread Hans Reiser
Maciej Soltysiak wrote: ) Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } this means bad hard drive, or at least a bad sector on it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re[2]: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-07 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
Hello Hans, Monday, February 7, 2005, 9:19:47 PM, you wrote: Maciej Soltysiak wrote: ) Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Feb 6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } this means bad hard drive,

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.11-rc3-mm1] Relay Fork Module

2005-02-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Guillaume Thouvenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, This module sends a signal to one or several processes (in user space) when a fork occurs in the kernel. It relays information about forks (parent and child pid) to a user space application. ... This patch is used by the

2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-06 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
Hello, I just want to report a lockup on my 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 machine. I was working on it via ssh and suddenly the machine stopped responding. When, the next day I came up to the console it was printing over and over this oops. In the logs I could find the oops. I am posting it inline here along

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
rnel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ > > > > > > It gives me a kernel panic at boot if I have CONFIG_FB_RADEON > > > enabled. If I also have CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE enabled, I get this > > > output: > >

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
; > considered as spent in the kernel, so it triggers softlockup as soon > > as its threads are woken up (is that correct, Pavel?). > > ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to > the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)? I did: --- /ho

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 : mount UDF CDRW stuck in D state

2005-02-06 Thread Laurent Riffard
Le 06.02.2005 09:18, Peter Osterlund a écrit : [snip] Anyway, the problem is that the add-struct-request-end_io-callback patch forgot to update pktcdvd.c. This patch fixes it. It should probably be merged into the add-struct-request-end_io-callback patch, because that patch already fixes up other

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Joseph Fannin
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:33:44PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:07 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:07 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:07 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ > > It gives me a kernel panic at boot if I have CONFIG_FB_RADEON &

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ It gives me a kernel panic at boot if I have CONFIG_FB_RADEON enabled. If I also have CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE enabled, I get this output:

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-06 Thread Rogério Brito
here be anything else that I should try? Thank you very much for the help, Rogério. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogério Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Linux version 2.6.11-rc3-mm1-1 ([EMAIL PROT

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 : mount UDF CDRW stuck in D state

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Osterlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Peter Osterlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > This is k

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 : mount UDF CDRW stuck in D state

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Osterlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Osterlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Laurent Riffard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is kernel 2.6.11-rc3-mm1. I can't mount an UDF-formatted cdrw in packet-writing mode. Mount process gets

Re: irq 10: nobody cared! (was: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1)

2005-02-06 Thread Rogério Brito
. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogério Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Linux version 2.6.11-rc3-mm1-1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-5)) #1 Sat Feb 5 20:48:14 BRST 2005 BIOS

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ It gives me a kernel panic at boot if I have CONFIG_FB_RADEON enabled. If I also have CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE enabled, I get this output: Unable to handle

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:07 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ It gives me a kernel panic at boot if I have CONFIG_FB_RADEON enabled. If I also have

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:07 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ It gives me a kernel panic at boot if I have

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Joseph Fannin
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:33:44PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:07 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/ It gives me a kernel

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 : mount UDF CDRW stuck in D state

2005-02-06 Thread Laurent Riffard
Le 06.02.2005 09:18, Peter Osterlund a écrit : [snip] Anyway, the problem is that the add-struct-request-end_io-callback patch forgot to update pktcdvd.c. This patch fixes it. It should probably be merged into the add-struct-request-end_io-callback patch, because that patch already fixes up other

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1: softlockup and suspend/resume

2005-02-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
up (is that correct, Pavel?). ah, ok. Could you try my patch and add touch_softlockup_watchdog() to the resume code (before interrupts are re-enabled)? I did: --- /home/rafael/tmp/kernel/testing/linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-02-05 20:57:03.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.11

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2005-02-06 Thread Peter Osterlund
Peter Osterlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 11:07 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm1

2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-06 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
Hello, I just want to report a lockup on my 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 machine. I was working on it via ssh and suddenly the machine stopped responding. When, the next day I came up to the console it was printing over and over this oops. In the logs I could find the oops. I am posting it inline here along

  1   2   >