On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:46 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
> variable "caller" is never assigned any value different from 0.
>
thanks, fixed in our GIT tree.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:46 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable caller is never assigned any value different from 0.
thanks, fixed in our GIT tree.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from
On 12/11/06, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
>...
> git-ubi.patch
>...
> git trees.
>...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable "caller" is never
On 12/11/06, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
...
git-ubi.patch
...
git trees.
...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable caller is never assigned any
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
>...
> git-ubi.patch
>...
> git trees.
>...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable "caller" is never assigned any value different from 0.
cu
Adrian
--
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
...
git-ubi.patch
...
git trees.
...
It doesn't seem to be intended that in ubi_dbg_vprint_nolock() the
variable caller is never assigned any value different from 0.
cu
Adrian
--
Is
6 matches
Mail list logo