Open reiserfs transactions (was Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18)

2007-02-12 Thread Stefan Rompf
Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel > when I switch on the system after suspend to disk. Actually, after kernel > has been loaded, the whole resuming (up to the point I have usable desktop > again) takes about three time less than the

Open reiserfs transactions (was Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18)

2007-02-12 Thread Stefan Rompf
Andrey Borzenkov wrote: This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel when I switch on the system after suspend to disk. Actually, after kernel has been loaded, the whole resuming (up to the point I have usable desktop again) takes about three time less than the

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2007-01-02 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 11:05 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Lee Garrett wrote: > > > I had the same problem (/boot on reiserfs, grub hanging for ages after > > > resume > > > with 2.6.19),

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2007-01-02 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 11:05 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Lee Garrett wrote: > > Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > [...] > > >This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel > > >when I switch on the > > >system after suspend to

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2007-01-02 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Lee Garrett wrote: > Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > [...] > >This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel > >when I switch on the > >system after suspend to disk. Actually, after kernel has been loaded, the > >whole resuming (up

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2007-01-02 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Lee Garrett wrote: Andrey Borzenkov wrote: [...] This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel when I switch on the system after suspend to disk. Actually, after kernel has been loaded, the whole resuming (up to the

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2007-01-02 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 11:05 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Lee Garrett wrote: Andrey Borzenkov wrote: [...] This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel when I switch on the system after suspend to disk. Actually,

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2007-01-02 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 11:05 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Lee Garrett wrote: I had the same problem (/boot on reiserfs, grub hanging for ages after resume with 2.6.19), but in

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2006-12-16 Thread Lee Garrett
Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > [...] This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel when I switch on the system after suspend to disk. Actually, after kernel has been loaded, the whole resuming (up to the point I have usable desktop again) takes about three time less than

Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18

2006-12-16 Thread Lee Garrett
Andrey Borzenkov wrote: [...] This is rather funny; in 2.6.19-rc5 grub is *really* slow loading kernel when I switch on the system after suspend to disk. Actually, after kernel has been loaded, the whole resuming (up to the point I have usable desktop again) takes about three time less than