Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said this thread "ATAPI CDROM" ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to
try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately
Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said this thread ATAPI CDROM ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to
try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately
Joel Soete wrote:
> Hello Alan, Jeff,
>
> Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
> for what said this thread "ATAPI CDROM" ;_(.
>
> I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to
> try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more success.
Joel Soete wrote:
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet
for what said this thread ATAPI CDROM ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to
try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more success.
I'm
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet for what said this
thread "ATAPI CDROM" ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more
success.
Here it was the test of new
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet for what said this
thread ATAPI CDROM ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more
success.
Here it was the test of new
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet for what said this
thread "ATAPI CDROM" ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more
success.
Here it was the test of new
Hello Alan, Jeff,
Reading a paper on this new libata, I just want to try but failled yet for what said this
thread ATAPI CDROM ;_(.
I first test the latest stable 2.6.19.1 without luck, so I also want to try latest 2.6.20-rc2 unfortunately without more
success.
Here it was the test of new
On 11/17/06, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:34:03PM -0500, Ioan Ionita wrote:
> >ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/25
> >ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> >ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x20)
> >ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xa0 Emask 0x5 stat 0x51 err
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:34:03PM -0500, Ioan Ionita wrote:
> >ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/25
> >ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> >ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x20)
> >ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xa0 Emask 0x5 stat 0x51 err 0x51 (timeout)
etc.. - yes known. Something in
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:34:03PM -0500, Ioan Ionita wrote:
ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/25
ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x20)
ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xa0 Emask 0x5 stat 0x51 err 0x51 (timeout)
etc.. - yes known. Something in the core
On 11/17/06, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 08:34:03PM -0500, Ioan Ionita wrote:
ata2.00: limiting speed to UDMA/25
ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata2.00: (BMDMA stat 0x20)
ata2.00: tag 0 cmd 0xa0 Emask 0x5 stat 0x51 err 0x51
On 11/16/06, Ioan Ionita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/16/06, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:22:47 -0500
> "Ioan Ionita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
> > It would seem that the CDROM is
On 11/16/06, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:22:47 -0500
"Ioan Ionita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
> It would seem that the CDROM is detected, but the device node is not
> created.
>
> I do have
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:22:47 -0500
"Ioan Ionita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
> It would seem that the CDROM is detected, but the device node is not
> created.
>
> I do have libata.atapi_enabled=1 as a kernel parameter. This is
I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
It would seem that the CDROM is detected, but the device node is not
created.
I do have libata.atapi_enabled=1 as a kernel parameter. This is a Vaio
laptop, with SiS 5513, PATA only, no SATA ports.
Did I miss anything?
Here's
I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
It would seem that the CDROM is detected, but the device node is not
created.
I do have libata.atapi_enabled=1 as a kernel parameter. This is a Vaio
laptop, with SiS 5513, PATA only, no SATA ports.
Did I miss anything?
Here's
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:22:47 -0500
Ioan Ionita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
It would seem that the CDROM is detected, but the device node is not
created.
I do have libata.atapi_enabled=1 as a kernel parameter. This is a Vaio
On 11/16/06, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:22:47 -0500
Ioan Ionita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
It would seem that the CDROM is detected, but the device node is not
created.
I do have
On 11/16/06, Ioan Ionita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/06, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:22:47 -0500
Ioan Ionita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave libata a shot. Hardisk works fine. However the CDROM doesn't.
It would seem that the CDROM is detected, but the
20 matches
Mail list logo
