Re: 2.6.20: Rebuild after trivial patch rebuilds way too much

2007-02-13 Thread Milton Miller
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:38:15 -0500 (EST), Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > Is not it too much fore a trivial two lines patch to a single file? > > {pts/1}% stg import > ~/patch/Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_not_working.patch > Importing > patch "Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_not_wor

Re: 2.6.20: Rebuild after trivial patch rebuilds way too much

2007-02-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:37:35 +0300 Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > Is not it too much fore a trivial two lines patch to a single file? > > {pts/1}% stg import > ~/patch/Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_not_working.patch > Importing > patch "Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_not_working

2.6.20: Rebuild after trivial patch rebuilds way too much

2007-02-12 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
Is not it too much fore a trivial two lines patch to a single file? {pts/1}% stg import ~/patch/Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_not_working.patch Importing patch "Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_not_working.patch"... done Now at patch "Re_2_6_20_rc6_libata_PATA_ATAPI_CDROM_is_n