Re: elevator oops [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-02-05 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Jan 28 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Andrew Morton napsal(a): > >Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ > > Under disk load I get disk: > [ cut here ] > kernel BUG at /home/l/latest/xxx/block/cfq-

Re: elevator oops [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-02-05 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Jan 28 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote: Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Under disk load I get disk: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at /home/l/latest/xxx/block/cfq-iosched.c:1026! I fixed this one today

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 > > Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Andrew Morton napsal(a): > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > > > http://userweb

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Pierre Ossman
Andrew Morton wrote: > > A quick scan indicates that the following files might be buggy in this > regard: > > drivers/mmc/wbsd.c > drivers/mmc/sdhci.c This are probably even buggier than so. They really should be using page_address(), it seems that kmap_atomic() gives the same result when not

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:27:27 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ I'm

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:27:27 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 > Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andrew Morton napsal(a): > > > Temporarily at > > > > > > http://userweb.kern

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:27:27 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ I'm still seeing this during bootup

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:27:27 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ I'm still seeing

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Pierre Ossman
Andrew Morton wrote: A quick scan indicates that the following files might be buggy in this regard: drivers/mmc/wbsd.c drivers/mmc/sdhci.c This are probably even buggier than so. They really should be using page_address(), it seems that kmap_atomic() gives the same result when not using

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-30 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ I'm still seeing this during bootup: BUG: at /home/l/latest/xxx/arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:52

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton napsal(a): > > Temporarily at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ > > I'm still seeing this during bootup: > BUG: at /home/l/latest/xxx/a

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Martin Bligh
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 Suparna Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - It seems that people have been busy

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 Suparna Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 > > "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > - It seems that people have been busy creating

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Suparna Bhattacharya
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 > "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had > > > to > > > apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix

[PATCH] 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: Fix compile if PREEMPT_RCU is set, but RCU_TRACE isn't

2007-01-29 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
2.6.20-rc6-mm1 fails to compile if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is set and CONFIG_RCU_TRACE isn' -- the fix is fairly obvious. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.19/kernel/rcupreempt.c.ark2007-01-28 23:38:07.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.19/

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:51:54 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think the easy and correct fix for this situation is defining > > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_ADDITIONAL_PAGES on x86_64 only if > > IA32_EMULATION is defined. (Because x86_64 proper doesn't seem to > > require

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-29 Thread Andi Kleen
> I think the easy and correct fix for this situation is defining > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_ADDITIONAL_PAGES on x86_64 only if > IA32_EMULATION is defined. (Because x86_64 proper doesn't seem to > require arch_setup_additional_pages() only IA32 emulation requires > it.) > > The patch below should

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, maybe I was confusing this with the fixes Ingo had for > local_bh_disable vs. preemption in the -rt tree. Ingo, do you have > preemptible RCU support in your -rt tree and if so did you have to fix > the networking stack to behave correctly

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-29 Thread Andi Kleen
I think the easy and correct fix for this situation is defining CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_ADDITIONAL_PAGES on x86_64 only if IA32_EMULATION is defined. (Because x86_64 proper doesn't seem to require arch_setup_additional_pages() only IA32 emulation requires it.) The patch below should fix it.

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:51:54 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the easy and correct fix for this situation is defining CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_ADDITIONAL_PAGES on x86_64 only if IA32_EMULATION is defined. (Because x86_64 proper doesn't seem to require

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, maybe I was confusing this with the fixes Ingo had for local_bh_disable vs. preemption in the -rt tree. Ingo, do you have preemptible RCU support in your -rt tree and if so did you have to fix the networking stack to behave correctly with

[PATCH] 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: Fix compile if PREEMPT_RCU is set, but RCU_TRACE isn't

2007-01-29 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
2.6.20-rc6-mm1 fails to compile if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is set and CONFIG_RCU_TRACE isn' -- the fix is fairly obvious. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-2.6.19/kernel/rcupreempt.c.ark2007-01-28 23:38:07.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.19/kernel

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Suparna Bhattacharya
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 Suparna Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this.

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Martin Bligh
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 Suparna Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It seems that people have been busy creating the

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:25:42 +0100 Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ I'm still seeing this during bootup: BUG: at /home/l/latest/xxx/arch/i386/mm/highmem.c:52 kmap_atomic() [c0104ffb

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:43:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > IIRC Ingo had made fixes for the networking stack in his rt tree since > > the networking code assumes in lots of places that rcu_read_lock > > disables preemption. > > oh. We'd better find those fixes then. I wonder what

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:29:29 +1100 Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in > > > preemptible [0001] code:

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in > > preemptible [0001] code: yum-updatesd/2846 > > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: caller is

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Herbert Xu
Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible > [0001] code: yum-updatesd/2846 > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: caller is nf_conntrack_in+0x363/0x47f > [nf_conntrack] > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: []

2.6.20-rc6-mm1 posixtest failures

2007-01-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 2.6.20-rc6 (run #1097), the openposixtest[1] suite results were: build errors: 13 files, 31 lines PASS: 1687 FAILED: 68 UNTESTED: 95 UNRESOLVED: 9 UNSUPPORTED: 22 INTERRUPTED: 7 SCORE:89 [1] http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/ (using v1.5.2) On 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:23:43 -0800 "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 > > "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had > >>> to > >>>

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation errors. And a number of patches

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:31:00 +0100 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible > [0001] code: yum-updatesd/2846 > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: caller is nf_conntrack_in+0x363/0x47f > [nf_conntrack] I'll

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to > > apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 > > compilation > > errors. And a number of patches were

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-28 Thread Parag Warudkar
seem to require arch_setup_additional_pages() only IA32 emulation requires it.) The patch below should fix it. (Please use attachment - less chance of whitespace issues. Sorry no control over mail client atm) Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm1/arch/x86_64/Kconfig.orig

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ > > will appear one day at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ > > Jan 28 22:58:

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 (build)

2007-01-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:49:28 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ > > will appear one day at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/

Re: elevator oops [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-01-28 Thread Jiri Slaby
Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Under disk load I get disk: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at /home/l/latest/xxx/block/cfq-iosched.c:1026! invalid opcode: [#1] SMP last sysfs file

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
- It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added.

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
- It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added.

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
. dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ? http://test.kernel.org/abat/68498/debug/console.log Pid: 30381, comm: dbench Not tainted 2.6.20-rc6-mm1-autokern1 #1 RIP: 0010:[] [] cfq_dispatch_requests+0xa9/0x4a2 RSP: :8100e3231418 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: RBX: 81007db97600 RCX

RE: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-28 Thread Parag Warudkar
CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y # CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC is not set # CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION is not set Hm Ok. That's explainable. You don't have CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION set and arch_setup_additional pages is only defined/exported in syscall32.c which won't be built in your case. (It should go away if you set

2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-28 Thread thunder7
] Error 1 # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 # Sun Jan 28 14:44:26 2007 # CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_64BIT=y CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32=y CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_SEMAPHORE_SLEEPERS=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_Z

elevator oops [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-01-28 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Under disk load I get disk: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at /home/l/latest/xxx/block/cfq-iosched.c:1026! invalid opcode: [#1] SMP last sysfs file: /devices/platform/i2c-9191

Unable to select IPV6 [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-01-28 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Unable to select IPV6. Menuconfig doesn't offer it when INET is selected. When it's not it appears in the menu, but after state change it gets away. The same behaviour in xconfig, gconfig

Unable to select IPV6 [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-01-28 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Unable to select IPV6. Menuconfig doesn't offer it when INET is selected. When it's not it appears in the menu, but after state change it gets away. The same behaviour in xconfig, gconfig

elevator oops [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-01-28 Thread Jiri Slaby
Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Under disk load I get disk: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at /home/l/latest/xxx/block/cfq-iosched.c:1026! invalid opcode: [#1] SMP last sysfs file: /devices/platform/i2c-9191

2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-28 Thread thunder7
# # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 # Sun Jan 28 14:44:26 2007 # CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_64BIT=y CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32=y CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_SEMAPHORE_SLEEPERS=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_ZONE_DMA=y

RE: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-28 Thread Parag Warudkar
CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y # CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC is not set # CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION is not set Hm Ok. That's explainable. You don't have CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION set and arch_setup_additional pages is only defined/exported in syscall32.c which won't be built in your case. (It should go away if you set

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
. dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ? http://test.kernel.org/abat/68498/debug/console.log Pid: 30381, comm: dbench Not tainted 2.6.20-rc6-mm1-autokern1 #1 RIP: 0010:[8039b19a] [8039b19a] cfq_dispatch_requests+0xa9/0x4a2 RSP: :8100e3231418 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
- It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added.

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
- It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added.

Re: elevator oops [Was: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1]

2007-01-28 Thread Jiri Slaby
Jiri Slaby napsal(a): Andrew Morton napsal(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Under disk load I get disk: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at /home/l/latest/xxx/block/cfq-iosched.c:1026! invalid opcode: [#1] SMP last sysfs file

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 (build)

2007-01-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 23:49:28 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ will appear one day at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ allyesconfig on x86_64 does not build

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1: linker error with arch_setup_additional_pages

2007-01-28 Thread Parag Warudkar
() only IA32 emulation requires it.) The patch below should fix it. (Please use attachment - less chance of whitespace issues. Sorry no control over mail client atm) Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm1/arch/x86_64/Kconfig.orig 2007-01-28 17:32:09.0

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Martin J. Bligh
Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation errors. And a number of patches were

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:23:43 -0800 Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to apply over sixty patches to

2.6.20-rc6-mm1 posixtest failures

2007-01-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 2.6.20-rc6 (run #1097), the openposixtest[1] suite results were: build errors: 13 files, 31 lines PASS: 1687 FAILED: 68 UNTESTED: 95 UNRESOLVED: 9 UNSUPPORTED: 22 INTERRUPTED: 7 SCORE:89 [1] http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/ (using v1.5.2) On 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Andrew Morton napisał(a): Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ will appear one day at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:31:00 +0100 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: yum-updatesd/2846 Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: caller is nf_conntrack_in+0x363/0x47f [nf_conntrack] I'll plug

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Herbert Xu
Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: yum-updatesd/2846 Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: caller is nf_conntrack_in+0x363/0x47f [nf_conntrack] Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: [c01053c6]

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: yum-updatesd/2846 Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: caller is nf_conntrack_in+0x363/0x47f

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:29:29 +1100 Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code:

Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:43:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: IIRC Ingo had made fixes for the networking stack in his rt tree since the networking code assumes in lots of places that rcu_read_lock disables preemption. oh. We'd better find those fixes then. I wonder what other code

2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-27 Thread Andrew Morton
Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ will appear one day at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ - Added the "IPWireless 3G PCMCIA Network Driver" tree as git-ipwireless_cs.patch (J

2.6.20-rc6-mm1

2007-01-27 Thread Andrew Morton
Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ will appear one day at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm1/ - Added the IPWireless 3G PCMCIA Network Driver tree as git-ipwireless_cs.patch (Jiri Kosina