Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-07-23 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:22:09 +0200 "Marco Berizzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the same kernel or should I compile with > some other options? With the same kernel. No additional options are needed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-07-23 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:22:09 +0200 Marco Berizzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the same kernel or should I compile with some other options? With the same kernel. No additional options are needed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-06-22 Thread Marco Berizzi
Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote: > > > > > Some RCU callback (that calls kmem_cache_free()) oopsed and > > > > panic'ed his box. [ Marco had experienced fs issues lately, so we > > > could > > > > suspect file_free_rcu() here, but I can't really tell from the

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-06-22 Thread Marco Berizzi
Christoph Lameter wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote: Some RCU callback (that calls kmem_cache_free()) oopsed and panic'ed his box. [ Marco had experienced fs issues lately, so we could suspect file_free_rcu() here, but I can't really tell from the stack trace;

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-06-21 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote: > > > Some RCU callback (that calls kmem_cache_free()) oopsed and > > > panic'ed his box. [ Marco had experienced fs issues lately, so we > > could > > > suspect file_free_rcu() here, but I can't really tell from the stack > > trace; > > > BTW whats with

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-06-21 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote: Some RCU callback (that calls kmem_cache_free()) oopsed and panic'ed his box. [ Marco had experienced fs issues lately, so we could suspect file_free_rcu() here, but I can't really tell from the stack trace; BTW whats with the rampant

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-06-11 Thread Marco Berizzi
Satyam Sharma wrote: > Hi Marco, Ciao Satyam, thanks for the feedback. > [ Re-adding David, XFS, Andrew and Christoph; this appears to be > some SLAB / fs (?) issue, so I'm a little out of my depth here :-) ] > > > > On 6/8/07, Marco Berizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> After few hours

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)

2007-06-11 Thread Marco Berizzi
Satyam Sharma wrote: Hi Marco, Ciao Satyam, thanks for the feedback. [ Re-adding David, XFS, Andrew and Christoph; this appears to be some SLAB / fs (?) issue, so I'm a little out of my depth here :-) ] On 6/8/07, Marco Berizzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After few hours linux has