Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-12 Thread mark gross
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:24:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said: > > > wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration. > > > > I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix > > C-state issue identified. > >

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-12 Thread mark gross
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 03:24:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said: wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration. I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix C-state issue identified. Confirming that

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-09 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said: > wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration. > > I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix > C-state issue identified. Confirming that patch left my CPUs mostly in C3 again. Thanks. I'll have to let Mark

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-09 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:30:07 PST, Mark Gross said: wing patch fixes up the cpuidle / pm-qos integration. I suspect that this is folded into another mm patch but it should fix C-state issue identified. Confirming that patch left my CPUs mostly in C3 again. Thanks. I'll have to let Mark and

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Gross
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery > much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) > > Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. > > As reported by

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Andrew Morton
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:03:52 -0800 Mark Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > > call. > > > > > > I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and > > > then > > > stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same > > > behavior > > > I was

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Gross
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:02:12AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery > > much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) > > > > Dell Latitude D820

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Gross
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery > much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) > > Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. > > As reported by

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Andrew Morton
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery > much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) > > Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. > > As reported by

2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
(Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine: 2.6.23-mm1: CnAvg

2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
(Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine: 2.6.23-mm1: CnAvg

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. As reported by 'powertop' on a

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Gross
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. As reported by 'powertop'

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 12:03:52 -0800 Mark Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... call. I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior I was getting by default before.

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Gross
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:02:12AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) Dell Latitude D820 laptop,

Re: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64

2007-11-08 Thread Mark Gross
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:19:44PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...) Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel. As reported by 'powertop'