Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-20 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > -ECONFUSED. Perhaps DEBUG_DRIVER may help some more. Or /me getting > > some sleep. > > Sleeping helped (improved reading abilities). > > From: Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > mmc: Avoid double sdio_unregister_bus() on module unload. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-20 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:35:18 +0200 Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:02:05 +0200, > Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -ECONFUSED. Perhaps DEBUG_DRIVER may help some more. Or /me getting > > some sleep. > > Sleeping helped (improved reading

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-20 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:02:05 +0200, Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -ECONFUSED. Perhaps DEBUG_DRIVER may help some more. Or /me getting > some sleep. Sleeping helped (improved reading abilities). From: Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mmc: Avoid double sdio_unregister_bus() on

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-20 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:02:05 +0200, Cornelia Huck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -ECONFUSED. Perhaps DEBUG_DRIVER may help some more. Or /me getting some sleep. Sleeping helped (improved reading abilities). From: Cornelia Huck [EMAIL PROTECTED] mmc: Avoid double sdio_unregister_bus() on module

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-20 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:35:18 +0200 Cornelia Huck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:02:05 +0200, Cornelia Huck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -ECONFUSED. Perhaps DEBUG_DRIVER may help some more. Or /me getting some sleep. Sleeping helped (improved reading abilities). From:

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-20 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, -ECONFUSED. Perhaps DEBUG_DRIVER may help some more. Or /me getting some sleep. Sleeping helped (improved reading abilities). From: Cornelia Huck [EMAIL PROTECTED] mmc: Avoid double sdio_unregister_bus() on module unload. Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok -

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-19 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:43:54 +0200, Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On fresh boot it happens with mmc_core. On the next fresh boot it didn't > happen with > firewire_core. So you can be right that some of them are follow-on errors. OK, this seems to point to mmc_core then. (I

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-19 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, > > I wrote a simple script that finds all modules in /lib/modules/`uname > > -r` > > and performs sth like 'modprobe $x; rmmod $x;' for every of them. The > > result is the > > output below. This actually happens when rmmod'ing a module. > > > > I narrowed it down to modules

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-19 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:45:13 +0200, Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I wrote a simple script that finds all modules in /lib/modules/`uname > -r` > and performs sth like 'modprobe $x; rmmod $x;' for every of them. The result > is the > output below. This actually

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-19 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:45:13 +0200, Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I wrote a simple script that finds all modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r` and performs sth like 'modprobe $x; rmmod $x;' for every of them. The result is the output below. This actually happens

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-19 Thread Mariusz Kozlowski
Hello, I wrote a simple script that finds all modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r` and performs sth like 'modprobe $x; rmmod $x;' for every of them. The result is the output below. This actually happens when rmmod'ing a module. I narrowed it down to modules mmc_core and

Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: atomic counter underflow

2007-09-19 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:43:54 +0200, Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On fresh boot it happens with mmc_core. On the next fresh boot it didn't happen with firewire_core. So you can be right that some of them are follow-on errors. OK, this seems to point to mmc_core then. (I couldn't