Simon, can you test this patch? I think it's the most straightforward
2.6.24 fix.
diff -r c60016ba6237 net/core/netpoll.c
--- a/net/core/netpoll.cTue Nov 13 09:09:36 2007 -0800
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.cFri Nov 23 13:10:28 2007 -0600
@@ -203,6 +203,12 @@ static void refill_skbs(void)
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:54:11PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:41:39PM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > Here's another thought: move all this logic into the networking core,
> > unify it with current softirq zapper, then allow it to be called fro
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:54:10PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:41:39PM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > Here's another thought: move all this logic into the networking core,
> > unify it with current softirq zapper, then allo
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:41:39PM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Here's another thought: move all this logic into the networking core,
> unify it with current softirq zapper, then allow it to be called from
> various other places (like atomic allocators). Then it'll all be in
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:32:22PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:11:20PM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:59:06PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:51:01PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:11:20PM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:59:06PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:51:01PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:48:51PM +0300, Evgen
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:15:24PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:59:43PM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > So I'd be surprised if that was a problem. But I can imagine having
> > problems for skbs without destructors which run into one of these in
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:59:06PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:51:01PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:48:51PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Stop, we are trying to free skb without d
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:59:43PM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> So I'd be surprised if that was a problem. But I can imagine having
> problems for skbs without destructors which run into one of these in
> __kfree_skb:
>
> dst_release
> secpath_put
> nf_conntrack_put
> nf_connt
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 08:57:57PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:07:56AM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:55:19PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:21:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL
> > >
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:51:01PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:48:51PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Stop, we are trying to free skb without destructor and catch connection
> > tracking, so it is not a solution. To fix
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:48:51PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Stop, we are trying to free skb without destructor and catch connection
> tracking, so it is not a solution. To fix the problem we need to check
> if it is not netfilter related, kind of this (not tested), Simo
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 08:57:57PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > My memory here is hazy, but I think this exists to rescue netconsole
> > in low-memory situations. This bit originated with Ingo, so maybe he
> > can recall.
> >
> > Netpoll can process an arbitrary number o
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:07:56AM -0600, Matt Mackall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:55:19PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:21:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > > [2059664.615816] __iptables__: init4 IN=ppp0 OUT
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 01:55:19PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:21:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > > [2059664.615816] __iptables__: init4 IN=ppp0 OUT=ppp0 WARNING: at
> > > kernel/softirq.c:139 local_bh_enable()
> > > [2059664.620535] [<8
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:21:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > [2059664.615816] __iptables__: init4 IN=ppp0 OUT=ppp0 WARNING: at
> > kernel/softirq.c:139 local_bh_enable()
> > [2059664.620535] [<80120364>] local_bh_enable+0x3c/0x97
> > [2059664.620657] [<8011c205>] __ca
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:47:35 + Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WARN during log message being output to ttyS0 and netconsole:
>
> [2059664.615816] __iptables__: init4 IN=ppp0 OUT=ppp0 WARNING: at
> kernel/softirq.c:139 local_bh_enable()
> [2059664.620535] [<80120364>] local_bh_enab
WARN during log message being output to ttyS0 and netconsole:
[2059664.615816] __iptables__: init4 IN=ppp0 OUT=ppp0 WARNING: at
kernel/softirq.c:139 local_bh_enable()
[2059664.620535] [<80120364>] local_bh_enable+0x3c/0x97
[2059664.620553] [<802e3356>] __nf_ct_ext_destroy+0x35/0x5b
[2059664.620
18 matches
Mail list logo
