On Tuesday, 15 of January 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
> > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
> >
> > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the
On Tuesday, 15 of January 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
On Sunday, 13 of January 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.23, please let me
> > know either and I'll add them to the list.
>
> Does this qualify as a regression?
I guess so.
> I have not seen a fix posted for it yet.
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
> > appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
>
> Perhaps keep the regression report
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
> appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with
a patch follow up with an
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:05:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
> appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
>...
I don't think sending the patches around brings much advantage.
But I always also Cc'ed
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches,
That is, the patches pointed to by the "Patch" fields in the list entries.
> CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
of. If any
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.23 reported since
2.6.24-rc1 was released, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know
of. If any
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches,
That is, the patches pointed to by the Patch fields in the list entries.
CCed to the appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:05:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
...
I don't think sending the patches around brings much advantage.
But I always also Cc'ed all
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with
a patch follow up with an
On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]
Perhaps keep the regression report as-is,
15 matches
Mail list logo
