On 10/01/2013 05:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:59:53 PM Peter Hurley wrote:
I have no love lost for proprietary modules but changing
acpi_bus_get_device() symbol's license seems gratuitous considering
the symbol pre-dates the mainline git tree and the code is
On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:59:53 PM Peter Hurley wrote:
> I have no love lost for proprietary modules but changing
> acpi_bus_get_device() symbol's license seems gratuitous considering
> the symbol pre-dates the mainline git tree and the code is just
> being moved from one source file to
I have no love lost for proprietary modules but changing
acpi_bus_get_device() symbol's license seems gratuitous considering
the symbol pre-dates the mainline git tree and the code is just
being moved from one source file to another.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
I have no love lost for proprietary modules but changing
acpi_bus_get_device() symbol's license seems gratuitous considering
the symbol pre-dates the mainline git tree and the code is just
being moved from one source file to another.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:59:53 PM Peter Hurley wrote:
I have no love lost for proprietary modules but changing
acpi_bus_get_device() symbol's license seems gratuitous considering
the symbol pre-dates the mainline git tree and the code is just
being moved from one source file to another.
On 10/01/2013 05:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:59:53 PM Peter Hurley wrote:
I have no love lost for proprietary modules but changing
acpi_bus_get_device() symbol's license seems gratuitous considering
the symbol pre-dates the mainline git tree and the code is
6 matches
Mail list logo