On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 12:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > OK, so the "possible irq lock inversion dependency detected" is a lockdep
> > regression, as you explained in the xfs-list thread. What about the
> > "RECLAIM_FS-safe -> RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock order detected" warning - I
> > haven't seen it
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:34:19PM -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 09:26, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
> > > the WARNING below was printed.
> > >
> > > Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 09:26, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
> > the WARNING below was printed.
> >
> > Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
> > post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
>
> Unlikely.
OK,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:53:05AM -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
> the WARNING below was printed.
>
> Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
> post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
> > the WARNING below was printed.
> >
> > Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
> > post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
>
> Sigh, only _after_
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 at 11:53, Christian Kujau wrote:
> after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
> the WARNING below was printed.
>
> Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
> post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
Sigh, only _after_ sending
Hi,
after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
the WARNING below was printed.
Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
Even later in the log an out-of-memory error appeared, that may or may not
be
Hi,
after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
the WARNING below was printed.
Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
Even later in the log an out-of-memory error appeared, that may or may not
be
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 at 11:53, Christian Kujau wrote:
after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
the WARNING below was printed.
Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
Sigh, only _after_ sending the
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Christian Kujau wrote:
after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
the WARNING below was printed.
Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
Sigh, only _after_ sending the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:53:05AM -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
the WARNING below was printed.
Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
Unlikely.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 09:26, Dave Chinner wrote:
after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
the WARNING below was printed.
Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
post to the XFS list yesterday[0]).
Unlikely.
OK, so the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:34:19PM -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 09:26, Dave Chinner wrote:
after upgrading from 3.13-rc8 to 3.14.0-rc2 on this PowerPC G4 machine,
the WARNING below was printed.
Shortly after, a lockdep warning appeared (possibly related to my
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 12:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
OK, so the possible irq lock inversion dependency detected is a lockdep
regression, as you explained in the xfs-list thread. What about the
RECLAIM_FS-safe - RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock order detected warning - I
haven't seen it again though,
14 matches
Mail list logo
