On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 11:00:31PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Applied to -fixes, with cc: stable and a note mentioning the regressing
> commit sha1 added.
Thanks to you and Chris for the quick diag & fix !
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:20:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:04:34AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > The crash happens here in i915_gem_entervt_ioctl() :
> > >
> > > 3659 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list));
> > > 3660
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:10:57PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> So far I have tested -intel-2.6.3 and -intel-2.7.1 with xorg-1.5.3 and
> kernel-3.7 on a 965gm both using the EXA AccelMethod, and both are still
> operational.
>
> Can you send the complete Xorg.log for the current failure? Thanks,
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 11:17:08 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:42:58 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:24:35AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > More likely X is segfaulting for another
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:42:58 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:24:35AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > More likely X is segfaulting for another reason altogether. Can you
> > > please attach the stacktrace (wi
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:42:58 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:24:35AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > More likely X is segfaulting for another reason altogether. Can you
> > please attach the stacktrace (with symbols!) and see if another
> > bisection is required?
>
> Yes, h
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:20:16 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:04:34AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > The crash happens here in i915_gem_entervt_ioctl() :
> > >
> > > 3659 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list));
> > > 3660 B
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:24:35AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> More likely X is segfaulting for another reason altogether. Can you
> please attach the stacktrace (with symbols!) and see if another
> bisection is required?
Yes, here it is.
_XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket fo
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 09:59:56 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 03:43:56AM -0400, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:48:57AM +1000, Dav
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:04:34AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The crash happens here in i915_gem_entervt_ioctl() :
> >
> > 3659 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.active_list));
> > 3660 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dev_priv->mm.flushing_list));
> > -> 3661
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 01:42:18 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Chris, Daniel,
>
> since version 3.5, my Asus EeePC 1005HA bugs during startx. I didn't
> have the time to investigate until this evening.
>
> I could bisect the commits and found that the following one was merged
> in 3.5-rc1 and is resp
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 03:43:56AM -0400, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:48:57AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> > Any reason you don't have KMS, you'll keep
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:48:57AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> > Any reason you don't have KMS, you'll keep hitting these non-kms bugs
>> > since it has no users anymore really
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:48:57AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Any reason you don't have KMS, you'll keep hitting these non-kms bugs
> > since it has no users anymore really.
> >
> > Granted they'll get fixed, but I suspect its a l
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:48:57AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Any reason you don't have KMS, you'll keep hitting these non-kms bugs
> since it has no users anymore really.
>
> Granted they'll get fixed, but I suspect its a losing battle over time.
Well, back in old times every time I tried to en
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Chris, Daniel,
>
> since version 3.5, my Asus EeePC 1005HA bugs during startx. I didn't
> have the time to investigate until this evening.
>
> I could bisect the commits and found that the following one was merged
> in 3.5-rc1 and is responsib
Chris, Daniel,
since version 3.5, my Asus EeePC 1005HA bugs during startx. I didn't
have the time to investigate until this evening.
I could bisect the commits and found that the following one was merged
in 3.5-rc1 and is responsible for these bugs that can reliably be
triggered :
1b50247a8ddd
17 matches
Mail list logo
