On Mon 2017-02-13 04:18:51, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > > > while true; do echo
On Mon 2017-02-13 04:18:51, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > > > while true; do echo
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > > > while true; do echo 0 >
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > > > while true; do echo 0 >
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > > while true; do echo 0 > online; echo 1 > online; done
> > >
> > > ...crashes x60
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > > while true; do echo 0 > online; echo 1 > online; done
> > >
> > > ...crashes x60
Hi!
On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > while true; do echo 0 > online; echo 1 > online; done
> >
> > ...crashes x60 with 4.10-rc in few minutes. [Which is bad -- it should
> > not die, but also
Hi!
On Mon 2017-02-13 09:48:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> > while true; do echo 0 > online; echo 1 > online; done
> >
> > ...crashes x60 with 4.10-rc in few minutes. [Which is bad -- it should
> > not die, but also
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> while true; do echo 0 > online; echo 1 > online; done
>
> ...crashes x60 with 4.10-rc in few minutes. [Which is bad -- it should
> not die, but also good -- this is easier to reproduce then running 100
> suspend cycles.]
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1
> while true; do echo 0 > online; echo 1 > online; done
>
> ...crashes x60 with 4.10-rc in few minutes. [Which is bad -- it should
> not die, but also good -- this is easier to reproduce then running 100
> suspend cycles.]
Hi!
> >>>And now it is:
> >>>[692517.868523] ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3
> >>>[692518.172074] ACPI : EC: EC stopped
> >>>[692518.172076] PM: Saving platform NVS memory
> >>>[692518.172269] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> >>>[692518.172269] ACPI: Low-level resume complete
>
Hi!
> >>>And now it is:
> >>>[692517.868523] ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3
> >>>[692518.172074] ACPI : EC: EC stopped
> >>>[692518.172076] PM: Saving platform NVS memory
> >>>[692518.172269] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> >>>[692518.172269] ACPI: Low-level resume complete
>
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
The kernel is 4.8.17 EOL, installed almost a month ago.
Platform ThinkPad x60, Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz
In dmesg I see that it used to be when 2 CPUs were OK:
[690409.476107] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 79.914 msecs
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
The kernel is 4.8.17 EOL, installed almost a month ago.
Platform ThinkPad x60, Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz
In dmesg I see that it used to be when 2 CPUs were OK:
[690409.476107] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 79.914 msecs
Hi!
> >The kernel is 4.8.17 EOL, installed almost a month ago.
> >Platform ThinkPad x60, Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz
> >
> >In dmesg I see that it used to be when 2 CPUs were OK:
> >[690409.476107] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 79.914 msecs
> >[690409.476547]
Hi!
> >The kernel is 4.8.17 EOL, installed almost a month ago.
> >Platform ThinkPad x60, Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz
> >
> >In dmesg I see that it used to be when 2 CPUs were OK:
> >[690409.476107] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 79.914 msecs
> >[690409.476547]
Woody Suwalski wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sat 2017-01-14 12:30:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores,
but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went
Woody Suwalski wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sat 2017-01-14 12:30:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores,
but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went
Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sat 2017-01-14 12:30:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
suspend/resume
Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sat 2017-01-14 12:30:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
suspend/resume
On Sat 2017-01-14 12:30:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >>I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
> > >>only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
> >
On Sat 2017-01-14 12:30:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >>I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
> > >>only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
> >
Hi!
On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >>I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
> >>only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
> >>suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
> >Whoever
Hi!
On Thu 2017-01-12 20:19:31, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >>I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
> >>only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
> >>suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
> >Whoever
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
Whoever did it, he seems to have returned the cpu in -rc3. All seems
to be good
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
Whoever did it, he seems to have returned the cpu in -rc3. All seems
to be good
Hi!
> I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
> only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
> suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
Whoever did it, he seems to have returned the cpu in -rc3. All seems
to be good now.
Hi!
> I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
> only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
> suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
Whoever did it, he seems to have returned the cpu in -rc3. All seems
to be good now.
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
pavel@duo:~$ uname -a
Linux duo 4.10.0-rc1+ #304 SMP Mon Dec 26 10:33:24 CET 2016 i686
GNU/Linux
Hi!
I used to have two cpus, and Thinkpad X60 should have two cores, but I
only see one on 4.10-rc1. This machine went through many
suspend/resume cycles. When backups finish, I'll try -rc2.
pavel@duo:~$ uname -a
Linux duo 4.10.0-rc1+ #304 SMP Mon Dec 26 10:33:24 CET 2016 i686
GNU/Linux
34 matches
Mail list logo