Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-31 Thread Ricky Beam
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Pavel Roskin wrote: >> You can a few nice tricks with it like plug in two PS/2 keyboards. I >> have this for my home setup. The only thing is make sure you don't >> have both keyboards plugged in when you turn your PC on. I found BIOS >> get confused by two PS/2 keyboards. As

Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-31 Thread Ricky Beam
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Pavel Roskin wrote: You can a few nice tricks with it like plug in two PS/2 keyboards. I have this for my home setup. The only thing is make sure you don't have both keyboards plugged in when you turn your PC on. I found BIOS get confused by two PS/2 keyboards. As you can

Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-29 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:50:59AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hi, James! > > > So as you can see even USB keyboards depend on pc_keyb.c. So their is > > no way around this. > > Perhaps redefining kbd_read_input() will help. It's cruel, I know :-) Or just kill allocating the IRQ in the

Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-29 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:50:59AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: Hi, James! So as you can see even USB keyboards depend on pc_keyb.c. So their is no way around this. Perhaps redefining kbd_read_input() will help. It's cruel, I know :-) Or just kill allocating the IRQ in the pc_keyb.c

Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-28 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hi, James! > So as you can see even USB keyboards depend on pc_keyb.c. So their is > no way around this. Perhaps redefining kbd_read_input() will help. It's cruel, I know :-) > You can a few nice tricks with it like plug in two PS/2 keyboards. I > have this for my home setup. The only thing is

Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-28 Thread James Simmons
> I'm trying to run Linux on a broken motherboard that is constantly > producing random noice on the AT keyboard port. I'm going to use a USB > keyboard, but I cannot get Linux to ignore the AT keyboard port. Not that I know. The current way it works is: 1) Current 2.4 way for AT keyboards:

Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-28 Thread James Simmons
I'm trying to run Linux on a broken motherboard that is constantly producing random noice on the AT keyboard port. I'm going to use a USB keyboard, but I cannot get Linux to ignore the AT keyboard port. Not that I know. The current way it works is: 1) Current 2.4 way for AT keyboards:

Re: AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-28 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hi, James! So as you can see even USB keyboards depend on pc_keyb.c. So their is no way around this. Perhaps redefining kbd_read_input() will help. It's cruel, I know :-) You can a few nice tricks with it like plug in two PS/2 keyboards. I have this for my home setup. The only thing is

AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
a dependent variable - it's set based on the machine type. Does anybody have a patch for making AT keyboard optional on i386 or should I make it myself? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE

AT keyboard optional on i386?

2001-05-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
a dependent variable - it's set based on the machine type. Does anybody have a patch for making AT keyboard optional on i386 or should I make it myself? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More