Hello Charlemagne,
Charlemagne Lasse schreef op za 11-11-2017 om 23:29 [+0100]:
> 1. SPDX license identifier first
> 2. Full BSD/MIT/ISC license in source files is sufficient and don't
> require License-Filename
> 3. verbatim licenses which are not in source files (GPL, LGPL, MPL, ...)
>
Hello Charlemagne,
Charlemagne Lasse schreef op za 11-11-2017 om 23:29 [+0100]:
> 1. SPDX license identifier first
> 2. Full BSD/MIT/ISC license in source files is sufficient and don't
> require License-Filename
> 3. verbatim licenses which are not in source files (GPL, LGPL, MPL, ...)
>
Hi,
2017-11-11 22:21 GMT+01:00 Jonas Oberg :
> I wouldn't do that now. Adding SPDX license identifiers is in most cases
> quite sufficient and something which I would encourage first.
>
> What you mention about the LICENSES/ folder and the License-Filename
> tag (which can be
Hi,
2017-11-11 22:21 GMT+01:00 Jonas Oberg :
> I wouldn't do that now. Adding SPDX license identifiers is in most cases
> quite sufficient and something which I would encourage first.
>
> What you mention about the LICENSES/ folder and the License-Filename
> tag (which can be repeated) is an
Hi Charlemagne,
> Since some people started to add the SPDX headers to some files, it
> might now be the right time to ask to get a LICENSES folder which will
> contain the separate licenses.
I wouldn't do that now. Adding SPDX license identifiers is in most cases
quite sufficient and something
Hi Charlemagne,
> Since some people started to add the SPDX headers to some files, it
> might now be the right time to ask to get a LICENSES folder which will
> contain the separate licenses.
I wouldn't do that now. Adding SPDX license identifiers is in most cases
quite sufficient and something
Hi,
the linux kernel is a GPL-2.0 project but is build based on files using
all kinds of different licenses. It would be really nice when these
licenses could be correctly referenced as described in the
https://reuse.software/practices/ from the FSF.
Since some people started to add the SPDX
Hi,
the linux kernel is a GPL-2.0 project but is build based on files using
all kinds of different licenses. It would be really nice when these
licenses could be correctly referenced as described in the
https://reuse.software/practices/ from the FSF.
Since some people started to add the SPDX
8 matches
Mail list logo