Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-16 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 02:11:55PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:22:31PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:08:12AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: > > > > > > There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-16 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 02:11:55PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:22:31PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:08:12AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the 2.4.1ac

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:22:31PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:08:12AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: > > > > There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the 2.4.1ac > > kernel series around 2.4.1-ac7. I would be curious to know if it

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:08:12AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: > > There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the 2.4.1ac > kernel series around 2.4.1-ac7. I would be curious to know if it worked on > your machine properly. Ok. Will try. Are there any changes that

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Doug Ledford
Ville Herva wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:16:01PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: > > > Ville Herva wrote: > > > > > > > > It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is > > > > still a

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:16:01PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: > > Ville Herva wrote: > > > > > > It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is > > > still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:16:01PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: Ville Herva wrote: It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Doug Ledford
Ville Herva wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:16:01PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: Ville Herva wrote: It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is still a no-go with 7892. The

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:08:12AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the 2.4.1ac kernel series around 2.4.1-ac7. I would be curious to know if it worked on your machine properly. Ok. Will try. Are there any changes that could

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-15 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:22:31PM +0200, you [Ville Herva] claimed: On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:08:12AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: There was a new aic7xxx driver (version 5.2.3) that went into the 2.4.1ac kernel series around 2.4.1-ac7. I would be curious to know if it worked on

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-08 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: > Ville Herva wrote: > > > > It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is > > still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just prints this once a > > second: > > > > (SCSI0:0:3:1) Synchronous at 160

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-08 Thread Doug Ledford
Ville Herva wrote: > > It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is > still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just prints this once a > second: > > (SCSI0:0:3:1) Synchronous at 160 Mbyte/sec offset 31 > (SCSI0:0:3:1) CRC error during data in phase > (SCSI0:0:3:1)

Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-08 Thread Ville Herva
It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just prints this once a second: (SCSI0:0:3:1) Synchronous at 160 Mbyte/sec offset 31 (SCSI0:0:3:1) CRC error during data in phase (SCSI0:0:3:1) CRC error in intermediate CRC

Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-08 Thread Ville Herva
It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just prints this once a second: (SCSI0:0:3:1) Synchronous at 160 Mbyte/sec offset 31 (SCSI0:0:3:1) CRC error during data in phase (SCSI0:0:3:1) CRC error in intermediate CRC

Re: Aic7xxx troubles with 2.4.1ac6

2001-02-08 Thread Ville Herva
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:53:55AM -0500, you [Doug Ledford] claimed: Ville Herva wrote: It looks like ac6 (which I believe includes the patch you posted) is still a no-go with 7892. The boot halts and it just prints this once a second: (SCSI0:0:3:1) Synchronous at 160 Mbyte/sec