Re: BKCVS still updated?

2005-02-26 Thread Larry McVoy
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:49:53PM +0100, Stelian Pop wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:02:18AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > He should be back now, maybe he can tell us more about what happened ? > > > > We had a nameserver problem and the machine dedicated to this didn't get > > updated w

Re: BKCVS still updated?

2005-02-26 Thread Stelian Pop
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:02:18AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > He should be back now, maybe he can tell us more about what happened ? > > We had a nameserver problem and the machine dedicated to this didn't get > updated with a new resolve.conf. It's fixed now and updating, probably > be there

Re: BKCVS still updated?

2005-02-25 Thread Larry McVoy
> He should be back now, maybe he can tell us more about what happened ? We had a nameserver problem and the machine dedicated to this didn't get updated with a new resolve.conf. It's fixed now and updating, probably be there in an hour. -- --- Larry McVoylm at bitmover.com

Re: BKCVS still updated?

2005-02-25 Thread Stelian Pop
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:45:26PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know whether the BKCVS repository > (rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5) is still > updated? The last ChangeSet,v revision I got is 1.26750 which was > checked in more than a week ago. > >

BKCVS still updated?

2005-02-23 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi, Does anyone know whether the BKCVS repository (rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5) is still updated? The last ChangeSet,v revision I got is 1.26750 which was checked in more than a week ago. (Sorry if I missed some e-mails about a planned down-time) Thanks, Catalin - To