Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-26 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:22:46 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:08:48 +0100, > > I wrote: > >> At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:05:07 -0400, > >>> > >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/3/9 > >> This is a different problem. > >> A known workaround is to provide probe_m

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-23 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:08:48 +0100, > I wrote: >> At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:05:07 -0400, >>> >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/3/9 >> This is a different problem. >> A known workaround is to provide probe_mask=1 module option. > > BTW, does this happen on the latest linus git tre

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:32:50 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:08:48 +0100, > > I wrote: > >> At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:05:07 -0400, > >> Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >>> Takashi Iwai wrote: > X60/T60 is known to be often broken regarding the communication >

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:08:48 +0100, > I wrote: >> At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:05:07 -0400, >> Chuck Ebbert wrote: >>> Takashi Iwai wrote: X60/T60 is known to be often broken regarding the communication between the controller and the codec chip. When this kind of thing >>

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:08:48 +0100, I wrote: > > At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:05:07 -0400, > Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > X60/T60 is known to be often broken regarding the communication > > > between the controller and the codec chip. When this kind of thing > > > happe

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:05:07 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > X60/T60 is known to be often broken regarding the communication > > between the controller and the codec chip. When this kind of thing > > happens, the driver tries to switch to a single-shot I/O without usin

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Takashi Iwai wrote: > > X60/T60 is known to be often broken regarding the communication > between the controller and the codec chip. When this kind of thing > happens, the driver tries to switch to a single-shot I/O without using > ring-buffers and IRQs, and even in such a mode, the communication

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:22:03 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I got this nastinness in my syslog... perhaps HDA intel takes too long > > > to play with its hardware? Or should we just kill the softlockup > > > watchdog since Linux is not realtime system, yet? > > > > X60/T60 is known t

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I got this nastinness in my syslog... perhaps HDA intel takes too long > > to play with its hardware? Or should we just kill the softlockup > > watchdog since Linux is not realtime system, yet? > > X60/T60 is known to be often broken regarding the communication > between the controller an

Re: BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:32:53 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > I got this nastinness in my syslog... perhaps HDA intel takes too long > to play with its hardware? Or should we just kill the softlockup > watchdog since Linux is not realtime system, yet? X60/T60 is known to be often broken re

BUG: soft lockup during suspend

2007-03-20 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I got this nastinness in my syslog... perhaps HDA intel takes too long to play with its hardware? Or should we just kill the softlockup watchdog since Linux is not realtime system, yet? Pavel HDA Intel :00:1b.0: freeze BUG: