> > > But a better look has me wondering how all these gpus are syncing
> > > the framebuffer for direct access via cfb_imageblit and friends. I only
> > > see
> > > nouveau and intel gma even trying.
> >
> > Probably no other DRM driver uses hardware acceleration for fbcon.
>
> Yup. We've
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:30:54PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 03.02.2016 03:38, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On 02/01/2016 09:20 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>> Hi Archit,
> >>>
> >>> Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:30:54PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 03.02.2016 03:38, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On 02/01/2016 09:20 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>> Hi Archit,
> >>>
> >>> Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
>
> > > But a better look has me wondering how all these gpus are syncing
> > > the framebuffer for direct access via cfb_imageblit and friends. I only
> > > see
> > > nouveau and intel gma even trying.
> >
> > Probably no other DRM driver uses hardware acceleration for fbcon.
>
> Yup. We've
On 03.02.2016 03:38, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/01/2016 09:20 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> Hi Archit,
>>>
>>> Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
>>> At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
>>
>> Thanks for sharing
On 03.02.2016 03:38, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/01/2016 09:20 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> Hi Archit,
>>>
>>> Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
>>> At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
>>
>> Thanks for sharing
On 02/01/2016 09:20 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Hi Archit,
>>
>> Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
>> At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
>
> Thanks for sharing this.
>
>>
>> However, I'm concerned that fbcon
On 02/01/2016 09:20 PM, Archit Taneja wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Hi Archit,
>>
>> Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
>> At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
>
> Thanks for sharing this.
>
>>
>> However, I'm concerned that fbcon
Hi Peter,
On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
Hi Archit,
Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
Thanks for sharing this.
However, I'm concerned that fbcon functions, which may be called with
interrupts disabled, are now hooked
Hi Archit,
Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
However, I'm concerned that fbcon functions, which may be called with
interrupts disabled, are now hooked up to fbdev functions which may assume
interrupts are not disabled (as is the case
Hi Archit,
Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
However, I'm concerned that fbcon functions, which may be called with
interrupts disabled, are now hooked up to fbdev functions which may assume
interrupts are not disabled (as is the case
Hi Peter,
On 02/02/2016 02:07 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
Hi Archit,
Just booting 4.4-rc5+, I got this splat [1]
At first glance, this appears to be a simple fix.
Thanks for sharing this.
However, I'm concerned that fbcon functions, which may be called with
interrupts disabled, are now hooked
12 matches
Mail list logo