Hi!
> >>>Looking at the rest of the code.
> >>>
> >>>The DT doc indicated that this was a required child property so this is
> >>>why it
> >>>
> >>>errors out.
> >>>
> >>>Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Did you want me to fix up the LM3532 and send the patch?
> >If you could do that, that would be nice
Hello
On 7/29/19 5:00 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Looking at the rest of the code.
The DT doc indicated that this was a required child property so this is
why it
errors out.
Dan
Did you want me to fix up the LM3532 and send the patch?
If you could do that, that would be nice :-).
Ok
Hi!
> >Looking at the rest of the code.
> >
> >The DT doc indicated that this was a required child property so this is
> >why it
> >
> >errors out.
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >
> >
>
> Did you want me to fix up the LM3532 and send the patch?
If you could do that, that would be nice :-).
> Or do you have
Pavel
On 7/24/19 10:22 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
Pavel
On 7/24/19 7:45 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
+
static int lm3532_parse_node(struct lm3532_data *priv)
{
struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
@@ -536,11 +579,13 @@ static int lm3532_parse_node(struct lm3532_data
*priv)
ret =
Pavel
On 7/24/19 7:45 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
+
static int lm3532_parse_node(struct lm3532_data *priv)
{
struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
@@ -536,11 +579,13 @@ static int lm3532_parse_node(struct lm3532_data *priv)
ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child,
Pavel
On 7/24/19 7:45 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
So now the backlight LED can be controlled. Good. (And thanks!)
But I seem to remember that backlight had range from "is it really on?"
to "very bright"; now it seems to have range from "bright" to "very
bright".
Any ideas what goes on
Hi!
> >So now the backlight LED can be controlled. Good. (And thanks!)
> >
> >But I seem to remember that backlight had range from "is it really on?"
> >to "very bright"; now it seems to have range from "bright" to "very
> >bright".
> >
> >Any ideas what goes on there?
>
> In the LM3552 driver
On Tue 2019-07-23 10:53:16, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Pavel
>
> On 7/22/19 3:59 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >So now the backlight LED can be controlled. Good. (And thanks!)
> >
> >But I seem to remember that backlight had range from "is it really on?"
> >to "very bright"; now it seems to have
Pavel
On 7/22/19 3:59 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
So now the backlight LED can be controlled. Good. (And thanks!)
But I seem to remember that backlight had range from "is it really on?"
to "very bright"; now it seems to have range from "bright" to "very
bright".
Any ideas what goes on there?
Hi!
So now the backlight LED can be controlled. Good. (And thanks!)
But I seem to remember that backlight had range from "is it really on?"
to "very bright"; now it seems to have range from "bright" to "very
bright".
Any ideas what goes on there?
Thanks,
10 matches
Mail list logo