On 11.12.2014 22:32, Ming Lin wrote:
> On 12/11/2014 02:07 AM, Dongsu Park wrote:
> > On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
> >> Just tried to edit a btrfs file.
> >>
> >> [ 45.216351] BTRFS error (device sdb1): partial page write in btrfs with
> >> offset 0 and length 8192
> >> [ 45.217522]
On 11.12.2014 22:32, Ming Lin wrote:
On 12/11/2014 02:07 AM, Dongsu Park wrote:
On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
Just tried to edit a btrfs file.
[ 45.216351] BTRFS error (device sdb1): partial page write in btrfs with
offset 0 and length 8192
[ 45.217522] BTRFS critical
On 12/11/2014 02:07 AM, Dongsu Park wrote:
> Hi Ming & Kent,
>
> On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
>>> Try this fix:
>> Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
>
> @kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the ext4 lockup I've seen.
>
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Dongsu Park
wrote:
> Hi Ming & Kent,
>
> On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
>> > Try this fix:
>> Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
>
> @kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the ext4 lockup I've
Hi Kent,
On 10.12.2014 14:49, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:48:13PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> >
> > On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> > > > Playing a little with your
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:07:51AM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> Hi Ming & Kent,
>
> On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
> > > Try this fix:
> > Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
>
> @kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the ext4
Hi Ming & Kent,
On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
> > Try this fix:
> Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
@kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the ext4 lockup I've seen.
I've applied it to my tree, under the branch
Hi Ming Kent,
On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
Try this fix:
Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
@kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the ext4 lockup I've seen.
I've applied it to my tree, under the branch
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:07:51AM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Hi Ming Kent,
On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
Try this fix:
Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
@kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the ext4 lockup I've
Hi Kent,
On 10.12.2014 14:49, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:48:13PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Playing a little with your block_stuff
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Dongsu Park
dongsu.p...@profitbricks.com wrote:
Hi Ming Kent,
On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
Try this fix:
Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
@kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the
On 12/11/2014 02:07 AM, Dongsu Park wrote:
Hi Ming Kent,
On 10.12.2014 23:11, Ming Lin wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
Try this fix:
Yes, it fixed ext4 problem.
@kent: Thank you for the patch. Indeed it fixes the ext4 lockup I've seen.
I've applied it
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Dongsu Park
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks for the reply.
>> >
>> > On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
>> >> > Playing a little with
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Dongsu Park
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply.
> >
> > On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> >> > Playing a little with your
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:48:13PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> > > Playing a little with your block_stuff tree based on 3.15, however,
> > > I think there still
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Dongsu Park
wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
>> > Playing a little with your block_stuff tree based on 3.15, however,
>> > I think there still seems to be
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Dongsu Park
dongsu.p...@profitbricks.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Playing a little with your block_stuff tree based on 3.15, however,
I think there
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:48:13PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Playing a little with your block_stuff tree based on 3.15, however,
I think there still seems to
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Dongsu Park
dongsu.p...@profitbricks.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Playing a little
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Ming Lin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Dongsu Park
dongsu.p...@profitbricks.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Playing a little
Thanks for the reply.
On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> > Playing a little with your block_stuff tree based on 3.15, however,
> > I think there still seems to be a couple of issues.
> > First of all, it doesn't work with
Thanks for the reply.
On 05.12.2014 19:02, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Playing a little with your block_stuff tree based on 3.15, however,
I think there still seems to be a couple of issues.
First of all, it doesn't work with
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> Hi Kent,
>
> On 23.11.2014 20:16, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Since I'm starting to resign myself to the fact that I'm probably not going
> > to
> > have much time for upstream development again any time soon, I figured
> > maybe I
>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
Hi Kent,
On 23.11.2014 20:16, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Since I'm starting to resign myself to the fact that I'm probably not going
to
have much time for upstream development again any time soon, I figured
maybe I
should try
Hi Kent,
On 23.11.2014 20:16, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Since I'm starting to resign myself to the fact that I'm probably not going to
> have much time for upstream development again any time soon, I figured maybe I
> should try writing down all the things I was working on or planning on working
>
Hi Kent,
On 23.11.2014 20:16, Kent Overstreet wrote:
Since I'm starting to resign myself to the fact that I'm probably not going to
have much time for upstream development again any time soon, I figured maybe I
should try writing down all the things I was working on or planning on working
on
Since I'm starting to resign myself to the fact that I'm probably not going to
have much time for upstream development again any time soon, I figured maybe I
should try writing down all the things I was working on or planning on working
on in case someone else is feeling ambitious and looking for
Since I'm starting to resign myself to the fact that I'm probably not going to
have much time for upstream development again any time soon, I figured maybe I
should try writing down all the things I was working on or planning on working
on in case someone else is feeling ambitious and looking for
28 matches
Mail list logo